|
Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).E1,g2: this event was extracted from a retrospective review of clinical data that was intentionally anonymized by a third-party vendor before being provided to our firm.As a result, it is not possible to determine the specific healthcare facility where the event occurred.H6: this complaint was opened by smith+nephew to document a patient complication identified through the review of clinical evidence from post market clinical data collection activities that includes reference to the use of a smith+nephew product.The reported issue(s) relate to known inherent procedural risks that are appropriately documented in our risk files.Smith+nephew will continue to monitor trends in accordance with our post-market surveillance process and take necessary action as required if anticipated severity and/or occurrence rates are exceeded.Smith+nephew has no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on our review of all currently available information, we are unable to confirm a relationship between the reported event and the device or identify a definitive root cause.However, as the use of our product cannot be excluded as a potential cause or contributory factor to the reported issue, we are conservatively submitting this report in accordance with applicable regulations.If additional information becomes available that alters the conclusions of this report, a follow-up report will be submitted as required.
|
|
It was reported that, a patient who initially underwent placement of a taylor spatial frame (tsf) on (b)(6) 2016 to treat an open tibia fracture and bone grafting subsequently developed nonunion on (b)(6) 2016.The patient was unable to tolerate prior attempts at treatment for his nonunion and was inconsistent with his ability to follow up or care for himself.Considering he had also severe deformity of the left foot from prior trauma, amputation of the left lower extremity was recommended.No further information is available.
|