|
(b)(4).Udi related data quality updates only section d.4.-unique identifier (udi)# corrected to (b)(4).One unit each of the manta, sheath, dilator, and depth locator were returned for evaluation, all with visible blood particulates.The manta was locked into the sheath with the lever actuated, but no components (collagen, lock, or anchor) were present or returned.Angiography showed a lower-positioned radiopaque lock with occluded flow at the access site.Balloon angioplasty indicated partial dog-boning and a dissection inferior to the access.The device lot history record review for lot number 73b2400587 manta 18f indicated no non-conformities related to this lot.The case details from the clinical staff were reviewed.A 72-year-old female patient (306 lbs, 5 ft 4 in, 52 kg/m2) with a history of low ejection fraction and severe mitral valve disease underwent ecmo arterial decannulation in the or.The manta instructions for use (ifu) include a warning against use in patients with marked obesity (bmi >40 kg/m2).After ecmo, an 18f manta was deployed at the measured depth.During deployment, the physician applied excessive force while pulling back the device, causing the suture line to break and forcing the collagen into the vessel.Post-angio confirmed malpositioning and intraarterial collagen deployment, causing occlusion.Manual pressure was applied, followed by balloon angioplasty, and a bare metal stent was deployed.Hemostasis was achieved in 15 minutes, and the patient initially remained stable with no harm, injury, or health consequences due to this event.However, later that evening, the patient developed limb ischemia and hyperlactatemia.Despite vascular consultation, no intervention occurred before the patient expired early in the morning.The suspected root cause of the occlusion requiring stenting was user error due to excessive force on the device, leading to suture breakage and intraarterial collagen deployment.The physician believes that the patient's death was unrelated to the manta closure device.
|