|
|
| Model Number |
KEYHOLE GUIDE, LEFT |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
|
| Date of Event |
02/07/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Investigation is in process.A follow-up report will be provided upon availability of additional information.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
On (b)(6) 2025, it was reported by a sales representative via (b)(4) that an ar-13417-01 keyhole guide broke inside the patient.This occurred during use in a case, the device was unknowingly left inside the patient and a revision surgery was needed to remove.Per facility: "on friday (b)(6)2025 {surgeon} performed an inbalance hto at {hospital} with loaner instrument set from order number (b)(4).In performing the case we didn't realize that the left sided keyhole guide (ar-13417-01) posterior leg broke for an unknown reason.Unfortunately, this was not caught during the rest of the case until the following morning (b)(6)2025 when {surgeon} was rounding on the patient in the hospital when they performed an x-ray and found the broken piece.The photos are attached.We then performed a 2nd surgery on this patient for removal of the retained hardware saturday 2/8/25.Although we do not have a great reason for why the instrument broke, we did notice the instrument was much more ¿weathered¿ and older than the right sided key-hole drill guide.{surgeon} was very understanding and in hindsight, we should have recognized the broken piece in x-rays taken during the rest of the case.The removal of the hardware was quick and the broken piece was collected, washed and put back in the tray for your examination.".
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: d9, g3, h3, h6.Complaint allegation is confirmed.One unpackaged, ar-13417-01, keyhole guide, left, serial/batch number (b)(6), was received for investigation.Visual inspection noted severe surface damage: oxidation, fading and abrasion marks.Additionally, a fragment of the device was broken off.Functional testing was not performed due to the damage to the device.The most likely cause for the reported failure is attributed to wear and tear due to repeated use.The manufacturing date of the device was 2011.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|