• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COVIDIEN LP LLC NORTH HAVEN TRI-STAPLE 2.0; STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COVIDIEN LP LLC NORTH HAVEN TRI-STAPLE 2.0; STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE Back to Search Results
Model Number SIGRADXT
Medical Device Problem Code Failure to Cut (2587)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 02/01/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
D10.Concomitant products: egiaushort egiaushort endogia ultra univ sht stap (lot p3g0259).Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during a sigmoidectomy, there were firing issues with the manual stapler.The specific malfunction involved a partial fire where only a few staples were fired, and the device did not cut.The issue occurred during the transection of the sigmoid.To resolve the issue, the device was replaced with a green reload.No patient complications have been reported as a result of this event.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: a1, b5, g3, h3, h6 h3.Evaluation summary: medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.The device was available for evaluation.Visual inspection noted the reload was partially fired with the interlock engaged.The jaws were open.Staple pushers were visible along two-thirds of the cartridge, starting from the proximal end.Functionally, the reload was loaded into a representative instrument.The interlock was overridden and the reload was applied to test media.All remaining staples were placed, and test media was cleanly transected.The reload interlock was tested and found to function properly.It was reported that the device fired partially.The reported issue was confirmed.The product analysis noted evidence that the device was not used as intended.It was also reported that the device did not cut.The reported issue could not be confirmed.The most likely cause could not be established from the information available.The manufacturing records for each device are thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medtronic quality specifications.The instructions included with this device provide the following guidance: failure to completely fire the reload will result in an incomplete cut and/or incomplete staple formation, which may result in poor hemostasis and/or leakage.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during a sigmoidectomy, there were firing issues with the manual stapler.The surgeon squeezed the handle three times and then pulled the black knob back to open the jaws, a few staples were deployed and it did not cut.The issue occurred during the transection of the sigmoid.To resolve the issue, the device was replaced with a green reload.No patient complications have been reported as a result of this event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TRI-STAPLE 2.0
Common Device Name
STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
COVIDIEN LP LLC NORTH HAVEN
195 mcdermott rd
north haven CT 06473
Manufacturer (Section G)
COVIDIEN LP LLC NORTH HAVEN
195 mcdermott rd
north haven CT 06473
Manufacturer Contact
justin ellis
8200 coral sea st ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635265677
MDR Report Key21463397
Report Number1219930-2025-00985
Device Sequence Number21127611
Product Code GDW
UDI-Device Identifier10884521543751
UDI-Public10884521543751
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateGA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K160176
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 04/15/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberSIGRADXT
Device Catalogue NumberSIGRADXT
Device Lot NumberN3H2219Y
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/07/2025
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/03/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer04/14/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/25/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date04/15/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/10/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Concomitant Medical Products
and Therapy/Usage Dates
SEE H11
Patient SexMale
-
-