• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ALCON RESEARCH, LLC - HOUSTON CENTURION SURGICAL PROCEDURE PAK; GENERAL SURGERY TRAY (KIT)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ALCON RESEARCH, LLC - HOUSTON CENTURION SURGICAL PROCEDURE PAK; GENERAL SURGERY TRAY (KIT) Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 8065752918
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 02/03/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation including root cause analysis is in progress.A supplemental mdr will be filed as necessary in accordance with 21 cfr 803.56 when additional reportable information becomes available.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
 
Event or Problem Description
A physician reported that the balance tip was broken during cataract surgery.The surgery was completed on the same day after replacing the tip with another one.There was no patient impact.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
A sample was not received at the investigation site for evaluation for the report.Therefore, the condition of the product could not be verified.A review of the device history record traceable to the reported lot number, indicates that the reported product was processed and released according to the reported product¿s acceptance criteria.The photo attached to the file was reviewed by the manufacturing site.The photo shows a broken phacoemulsification tip at the aspiration bypass (ab) hole in a pouch.The reported issue is confirmed from the photo review.The photo confirms a broken tip; however, since a sample was not received at the manufacturing site and the device history record review of the lot number provided indicated the product was processed and released according to the product¿s acceptable criteria, therefore; the root cause for the customer complaint issue cannot be determined.The exact root cause for this complaint is unknown, therefore, specific action with regards to this complaint cannot be taken.All phacoemulsification tips are hundred percent visually inspected by trained operators using 30x magnification during the manufacturing process.Complaints are reviewed and monitored at regular intervals for any significant adverse trends.No adverse trends have been observed associated with the reported product and event.No additional action is required at this time.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information provided in d.9., h.3., h.6.And h.11.One opened broken phacoemulsification tip with only one of the broken pieces returned, without a wrench, in a bag was received for the report.The returned phacoemulsification tip was visually inspected and was found to be non-conforming as the phacoemulsification tip was observed to be broken at the aspiration bypass (ab) hole.Only the piece with threads was returned.The breakage was observed to be very jagged, and the wall thickness was even.A review of the device history record traceable to the reported lot number, indicates that the reported product was processed and released according to the reported product¿s acceptance criteria.The photo attached to the file was reviewed by the manufacturing site.The photo shows a broken phacoemulsification tip at the aspiration bypass (ab) hole in a pouch.The reported issue is confirmed from the photo review.The investigation conducted a non-conformance review of the reported lot number.No deviations were identified and all corresponding production release specifications defined in the device master record were met.Based on the evaluation of the information and materials received, the investigation was unable to identify the root cause or origin of the reported event.The complaint evaluation confirms the phacoemulsification tip was broken.The root cause for the broken phacoemulsification tip cannot be determined from this evaluation.Additionally, no manufacturing-related deficiencies were found that potentially could have contributed to the complaint.As the root cause and its origin are inconclusive, further investigative or manufacturing actions are not warranted at this time.All phacoemulsification tips are hundred percent visually inspected by trained operators using 30x magnification during the manufacturing process.Receipt of additional relevant information or supporting materials will prompt a re-evaluation of the complaint investigation.Complaint data for all company products is reviewed monthly to monitor for adverse trends.During the last review, no adverse trends were observed for the reported product and event combination.Quality assurance has reviewed this complaint and will continue to monitor data for evidence of adverse trending and take further action, as appropriate.No further action warranted at this time.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CENTURION SURGICAL PROCEDURE PAK
Common Device Name
GENERAL SURGERY TRAY (KIT)
Manufacturer (Section D)
ALCON RESEARCH, LLC - HOUSTON
9965 buffalo speedway
houston TX 77054
Manufacturer (Section G)
ALCON RESEARCH, LLC - HOUSTON
9965 buffalo speedway
houston TX 77054
Manufacturer Contact
jonathan schlech
6201 south freeway
mail stop ab2-6
fort worth, TX 76134
8007579780
MDR Report Key21466342
Report Number1644019-2025-00522
Device Sequence Number21042843
Product Code LRO
UDI-Device Identifier00380657529186
UDI-Public(01)00380657529186(17)250731(11)230816(10)160DUA
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryIN
PMA/510(K) Number
K880961
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 08/01/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/31/2025
Device Catalogue Number8065752918
Device Lot Number160DUA
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Follow-Up
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/05/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer04/30/2025
07/13/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date02/26/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/15/2025
08/01/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/16/2023
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-