| Catalog Number |
RBYPODJ45 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012); Premature Separation (4045)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
01/31/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This device is available for return.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.This report is associated with mfr report numbers: 1.3005168196-2025-00058.2.3005168196-2025-00060.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the right subclavian artery using a pod coil, pod packing coils (packing coil), and a lantern delivery microcatheter (lantern).During the procedure, the physician experienced resistance advancing the pod coil into the target location.To achieve better packing, the physician repositioned the lantern multiple times.While advancing and retracting the pod coil, the pod coil unintentionally detached.The pod coil was removed from the patient.The same issue occurred with three additional pod packing coils.Out of the four detached coils, three coils were detached in the lantern and were removed by removing the lantern from the patient.It was reported that one of the four coils detached partially in the vessel and partially in the microcatheter and that coil was snared out.It is unknown which of the four detached coils was snared out.The procedure was completed using additional penumbra coils and the same lantern.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Evaluation of the second returned pod packing coil (packing coil) confirmed that the embolization coil was detached from its pusher assembly.The pusher assembly was not returned for evaluation, and therefore, the root cause of the reported detachment issue could not be determined.The packing coil was returned inside a non-penumbra snare device and was unable to be removed during evaluation.Further evaluation revealed offset coil winds on the embolization coil.This damage was incidental to the reported complaint and may have occurred during snaring of the embolization coil.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.Penumbra coils are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|