|
It was reported that a patient underwent an initial procedure with ncb femur plate.Subsequently, 11 days post implantation, underwent a revision surgery due to plate fracture.Plate was replaced.Diligence is completed and no further information on the reported event has been provided.
|
|
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional information.The following sections were updated.The reported ncb plate was returned with the associated screws and locking caps and examined by the product surveillance team.The plate was found to have fractured through a screw hole into two fragments.Macroscopically, it showed scratches, primarily on the non-bone-facing side.Four parallel horizontal abrasion marks were also noted proximal to the fracture, likely from contact with cerclage wires.Possible beach marks, indicating fatigue fracture, were visible on the fracture surface of the proximal fragment, with the fracture originating at the chamfer on the non-bone-facing side.Several bio-debris are present on the fracture surface.The distal fragment shows no clear evidence of beach lines and also contains several areas of biological debris.Polished areas and scratches on the fracture surfaces suggest contact between the parts after the fracture occurred.The returned screws and locking caps appear unremarkable, aside from expected signs of use.A review of the device manufacturing records confirmed no abnormalities or deviations.Review of the complaint history found no additional related complaints for this item and the reported part and lot combination.A review of the instructions for use states that: ¿failures of temporary internal fixation devices are more likely to occur in patients with unrealistic functional expectations, heavy patients, physically active patients and/or with patients who fail to follow through with the required rehabilitation program.¿ based on the available information, the reported event can be confirmed.The visual inspection of the plate confirms the reported fracture which most likely occurred due to fatigue.The plate also showed horizontal abrasion marks on the bone facing side, close to the fracture site.These marks were likely caused by the cerclage wire placed between bone and plate for fracture reduction.In the surgical technique it is stated that ncb bone spacers may be used if the fracture has been reduced using a cable, to avoid contact between the plate and the cable wire.If and to what extend the omission of these spacers may have contributed to the fracture remains unknown.Additionally, fatigue fractures might be a result of cyclic overloading, which may be contributed by patient related factors such as improper patient behavior or an inadequately healed bone.As outlined in the instructions for use, ¿failures of temporary internal fixation devices are more likely to occur in patients with unrealistic functional expectations, heavy patients, physically active patients, and/or those who fail to adhere to the required rehabilitation program.¿ given the patient¿s reported weight of 150kg and the inability to implement partial weight-bearing postoperatively due to unsuitable crutches, it is possible that these factors contributed to the plate fracture nine days post-implantation.Neither medical records nor radiographs were received which might have revealed other contributing factors.Based on the available information and the investigation conducted, it could be assumed that the cause is most likely multifactorial and therefore the root cause of the plate fracture could not be determined.If any further information is found which would change or alter any conclusions or information, a supplemental will be filed accordingly.Zimmer biomet will continue to monitor for trends.
|