|
The lens was returned adhered to the inside of a company product tray.Viscoelastic was observed on the lens.Both haptics were broken in the distal area.The broken portion of the haptics were not returned.The lens was cleaned with klrp to further evaluate.The optic was cut into two portions.One optic portion has linear cracks in the shape of an instrument used to grasp the lens.The anterior optic has scratches between the center and the edge.The other optic portion has many cracked areas on the edge.The posterior optic edge is split and chipped.Product history records were reviewed, and documentation indicated the product met release criteria.Information was provided that indicated the use of a qualified cartridge, handpiece, and viscoelastic combination.The root cause cannot be determined for the reported complaint of dysphotopsia, explant.The explanted lens was returned in pieces with broken haptics and multiple areas of damage to the optic.Each lens was subjected to a 100 percentage assessment of the power and optical resolution during the manufacturing process in order to determine acceptability per the lens model and diopter.The power and resolution of the returned lens could not be re-evaluated due to the optic damage.The monofocal toric company (2.25 cyl.) 14.5 diopter lens was removed and replaced with a non-company monofocal, 14.5 diopter.Due to the exchange of a monofocal toric 14.5 diopter lens to a monofocal non-toric 14.5 diopter lens, this suggests that a non-toric lens to an for the replacement lens may have been an improved choice for the patient's vision needs.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|