• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICROMAR INDUSTRIA E COMERCIO LTDA EASYDRILL PERFORATOR; DRILLS, BURRS, TREPHINES & ACCESSORIES (COMPOU

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICROMAR INDUSTRIA E COMERCIO LTDA EASYDRILL PERFORATOR; DRILLS, BURRS, TREPHINES & ACCESSORIES (COMPOU Back to Search Results
Model Number DM0210FAA
Medical Device Problem Codes Fracture (1260); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Insufficient Information (4580); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 02/05/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H3: product analysis: no conclusion can be drawn.Device evaluation anticipated but not yet begun.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during a procedure to perforate the skull to resect the tumor the product got broken and the upper part fell off from the device.It was also reported that there was no intervention performed and there was no delay in procedure.The procedure was completed with backup product.Additional information regarding the patient impact was being followed up from the facility.On additional follow the patient showed no signs of bone diseases.The surgery was performed due to a hematoma in the parietal bone area.Two holes were created using a perforator, but the device encountered an issue with the first hole.The em200 motor was used during the procedure.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H3: product analysis: evaluation determined that the perforator is broken and detached.The likely cause of the failure is due to wear and severe damage at the trigger made poor fit in the craniotome and excessive torque force applied when removing from the easy drill.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: updated h3: product analysis: evaluation determined that the perforator is broken and detached.The likely cause of the failure is due to wear and severe damage at the trigger made poor fit in the craniotome and excessive torque force applied when removing from the easy drill, also the coupling not compatible with hudson coupling.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EASYDRILL PERFORATOR
Common Device Name
DRILLS, BURRS, TREPHINES & ACCESSORIES (COMPOU
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICROMAR INDUSTRIA E COMERCIO LTDA
cpnj: 53.168.142/0001-29
av. marginal ao corrego da ser
sao paulo,sp 09980 -390
BR  09980-390
Manufacturer (Section G)
MICROMAR INDUSTRIA E COMERCIO LTDA
cpnj: 53.168.142/0001-29
av. marginal ao corrego da ser
sao paulo,sp 09980 -390
BR   09980-390
Manufacturer Contact
natalia matos
cnpj: 53.168.142/0001-29
av. marginal ao corrego da s
sao paulo,sp 09980--39
BR   09980-39
22713209
MDR Report Key21515466
Report Number1625507-2025-00632
Device Sequence Number4448594
Product Code HBF
UDI-Device Identifier07898959543609
UDI-Public(01)07898959543609(17)280318(10)0641/24
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryPL
PMA/510(K) Number
K141455
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 07/23/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Model NumberDM0210FAA
Device Catalogue NumberDM0210FAA
Device Lot Number0641/24
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/17/2025
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/05/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/21/2025
07/10/2025
07/23/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/04/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/26/2025
07/22/2025
07/23/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/18/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexMale
-
-