• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE CV AXIUM PRIME BRPL 3D; DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE CV AXIUM PRIME BRPL 3D; DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION Back to Search Results
Model Number APB-3-8-3D-ES
Medical Device Problem Codes Stretched (1601); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 12/17/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
Medtronic received information regarding an axium coil that had resistance in the sheath during delivery and was stretched.The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure to treat an unruptured saccular aneurysm in the ophthalmic artery segment of the right internal carotid artery (ica).The aneurysm max diameter was 3.2mm and the neck diameter was 2.9 mm.Patient blood flow and vessel tortuosity were normal.It was reported that the axium prime es spring coil and all accessory devices were prepared according to the instructions for use (ifu).The avigo micro-guidewire navigated the echelon10 microcatheter to the aneurysm sac, and the guidewire was withdrawn.The coil was introduced for embolization.However, the coil delivery wire could not be advanced through the introducer sheath.The introducer sheath and coil were subsequently removed together for inspection, revealing that the coil had been stretched.The coil was replaced, and the embolization was successfully completed.There was no harm or injury to the patient.Ancillary devices: 8f guiding guide catheter, echelon 10 micro catheter, avigo guidewire.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H3: product analysis as found condition: the axium prime device was returned for analysis within a shipping box; within a sealed plastic biohazard pouch; within a dispenser coil and outside its returned introducer sheath.Visual inspection/damage location details: no damages or irregularities were found with the introducer sheath.No damages or irregularities were found with the axium prime pusher.The axium prime implant coil was found to be damaged, stretched and broken from the pusher with the polypropylene filament also broken.The break was found to be at the detach element.Testing/analysis: the axium prime implant coil could not be used for resistance testing due to the damaged condition.The axium prime implant coil tip od (outer diameter) was measured and found to be 0.0109¿ which is within specification (specification: 0.0108¿ +.0010¿/-.0020¿).The introducer sheath id (inner diameter) was measured and found to be 0.0175¿ (0.4445mm) which is within specification (specification: 0.46mm ±0.02mm).No other anomalies were observed.Conclusion: based on the device analysis and reported information, the customer¿s report of ¿coil resistance/stuck in sheath¿ was confirmed as the damages found is consistent with resistance.The implant coil was found damaged/stretched/broken.There were no reported issues pushing the axium prime implant coil from within the introducer sheath during hydration per ifu.Therefore, it is possible the implant coil became damaged when retracting the implant coil following hydration or due to improper hubbing technique (over tightening of the rhv/sheath not fully seated within the hub) subsequently causing the implant coil to become stuck.Advancing the coil against resistance would result in damage to the implant.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AXIUM PRIME BRPL 3D
Common Device Name
DEVICE, VASCULAR, FOR PROMOTING EMBOLIZATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE CV
av. paseo del cucapah #10510
tijuana,bc 22210
MX  22210
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE CV
av. paseo del cucapah #10510
tijuana,bc 22210
MX   22210
Manufacturer Contact
justin ellis
9775 toledo way
irvine, CA 92618
7635265677
MDR Report Key21517389
Report Number9617601-2025-00221
Device Sequence Number15880958
Product Code KRD
UDI-Device Identifier00847536021242
UDI-Public00847536021242
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCH
PMA/510(K) Number
K151447
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 03/04/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/27/2026
Device Model NumberAPB-3-8-3D-ES
Device Catalogue NumberAPB-3-8-3D-ES
Device Lot Number227350336
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer01/16/2025
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/15/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/04/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/27/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age63 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-