|
|
| Catalog Number |
SCPX135MH |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Rupture (1546)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Deformity/ Disfigurement (2360)
|
| Date of Event |
12/15/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Since the device has not been returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors can be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.If the complaint device is received in the future, the investigation will be reopened and conducted as appropriate.Since no lot number was provided, no manufacturing record evaluation review could be performed.Reason for device explant and/or reoperation: rupture.D4: udi: as the lot number for the device involved in the event was not provided, the full udi is currently not available.Mentor is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which mentor has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, mentor, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mentor, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If certain information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a patient who underwent primary breast reconstruction with a mentor cpx4 plus, smooth, medium height tissue expander experienced right sided deflation post procedure.As a result, replacement with mentor gel was performed on (b)(6) 2025.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The mentor failure analysis lab received the device for evaluation on may 2, 2025.The analysis has begun but is not complete at this time.When the investigation and analysis have been completed, a supplemental report will be submitted.The lot number, previously unknown, was provided with receipt of the device.The lot number is 9914757.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device 9914757 number, and no non-conformances related to the malfunction were identified.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The investigation of the returned device was completed by the failure analysis lab on july 28, 2025.Device evaluation summary: the product was returned to mentor for evaluation.Mentor then conducted a visual inspection and microscopic examination of the returned device.Visual analysis of the returned device revealed that the tissue expander had a tear on the anterior view, between the union of the shell and bladder, at 4 o'clock.Microscopic examination was performed, and the cause of the deflation could not be identified.Based on the information currently available, a notification was sent to mentor's manufacturing team for further investigation.According to the manufacturing investigation, potential process failures resulting in possible leakage failure that may represent deflation/rupture were assessed concerning the product complaint.The process controls and data records collected for the deflated tissue expander are within specification.Therefore, the tear reported on the product are not able to be confirmed as manufacturing-related defect.Although no conclusion could be reached on the cause of the reported event, the instructions for use contain the following caution: the silicone shell of the tissue expander may easily be cut by a scalpel or ruptured by excessive stress, manipulation with blunt instruments, or penetration by a needle.Subsequent deflation and/or rupture could result.All devices should be carefully inspected for structural integrity prior to and during implantation.In addition, the patient should be advised that vigorous body movement (e.G., physical exercise) or excessive manipulation or trauma in the region of the expander may cause stress to the device and result in subsequent deflation.As part of mentor's quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released according to approved specifications.Based on the results of this investigation, it was determined that the product met the manufacturing release criteria: no corrective and preventive action (capa) is required now.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending as part of post-market surveillance.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|