| Catalog Number |
TMT4B11 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Fracture (1260)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Pain (1994); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
01/20/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Zimvie complaint number (b)(4).A4: weight unknown / not provided.G4: additional pma/510(k) number ¿ k113753 | k112160.Customer has indicated that the product is in process of being returned to zimvie for investigation.Once the investigation has been completed, a follow-up mdr will be submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the trabecular metal implant at tooth site #5 fractured at the tantalum/titanium interface and was removed.Symptoms as a result of the event: pain, loss of restoration.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
No additional event information received at the time of this report.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted to relay corrected data, additional information and device evaluation.Correction: h6 patient impact code was incorrectly submitted as 4582-no clinical signs symptoms or conditions and pain.The correct patient impact code is 1994-pain.The following sections are being reported: b4: date of this report was updated.D9: device availability and return date were updated.G3: date received by manufacturer was updated.G6: type of report was updated.H2: type of follow up was updated.H3: device evaluated by manufacturer was updated.H6: type of investigation codes were added: 4109, 4111 and 3331.H6: investigation findings code was added: 3252.H6: investigation conclusions code was added: 4307.H10: narrative/data was updated.Zimvie received one (1) tmt4b11, (imp tm 4.1mm mtx full, 11.5mm), for evaluation.Visual evaluation was performed, a fracture has been identified on the implants body.Dhr review was completed for the subject lot number.No deviations or non-conformances, which could have caused or contributed to the reported event, were noted as part of the dhr.Complaint history review was performed for similar events and no other complaint was identified.The customer did not submit images for the reported event.Based on the investigation and risk management file review the most likely root cause determined from the investigation was and clinician selects implant that is unable to resist long-term occlusal loading.Therefore, based on the available information, a device malfunction did occur.The fracture has been identified on the body.The reported event was confirmed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|