• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC NGAGE NITINOL STONE EXTRACTOR; FFL DISLODGER, STONE, BASKET URETERAL, METAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC NGAGE NITINOL STONE EXTRACTOR; FFL DISLODGER, STONE, BASKET URETERAL, METAL Back to Search Results
Model Number G48294
Medical Device Problem Code Material Split, Cut or Torn (4008)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 02/23/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported, during ureteral calculi removal, the user detected the handle was stuck and the tip of the ngage nitinol stone extractor was damaged.Its use was discontinued.Another same type device was used to complete the procedure.No section of the device remained inside the patient's body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.The complainant has not reported any adverse effects on the patient due to this occurrence.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
E1 - phone number: (b)(6), g4 - pma/510(k) #: exempt, h3 - device evaluation anticipated, but not yet begun.This report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Correction: h6: annex g code g04037 was inadvertently left out in initial emdr report.Additional information: d9.H3: device has been returned, and preliminary evaluation has been performed, however, our investigation is ongoing and device evaluation summary will be included in our follow up report once our investigation has been completed.This report includes information known at this time.A follow up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event or Problem Description
There is no new patient or event information to report.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable, or unchanged.Investigation evaluation; description of event: it was reported, during ureteral calculi removal, the user detected the handle was stuck and the tip of the ngage nitinol stone extractor was damaged.Its use was discontinued.Another same type device was used to complete the procedure.No section of the device remained inside the patient's body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.The complainant has not reported any adverse effects on the patient due to this occurrence.Reviews of the complaint history, device history record (dhr), instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions (mi), and quality control (qc) procedures, a visual inspection, and functional test of the returned device, were conducted during the investigation.One ngage nitinol stone extractor was returned in an open package with label.The handle did not actuate the basket formation and the support sheath was loose from the basket sheath.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.A review of the device history record (dhr) was performed and one related nonconformance was identified; however, all non-conforming product was scrapped, and there are 100% inspections in place to capture the non-conformance.A review of complaints with the same lot number shows no other complaints.A review of the ifu provides the following information: suggested handling instructions for extractors and forceps: important: excessive force could damage device.Although one relevant non-conformance was noted on the complaint lot, all non-conforming product was scrapped, there are 100% inspections in place to capture this non-conformance, adequate inspection activities have been established, there is objective evidence that the dhr was fully executed, and no other lot-related complaints have been received from the field.Therefore, it was concluded that there is no evidence that additional non-conforming product exists in house or in the field.The information provided upon review of complaint file, device history record, complaint history, inspection of returned device, and quality control documents cook has concluded that the device was manufactured to specification and that there is no evidence suggesting nonconforming product exists either in house or in the field.Based on the information provided, inspection of the returned device, and the results of the investigation, cook has concluded that the cause for the complaint could not be established.The appropriate personnel have been notified and cook will continue to monitor for similar events.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event or Problem Description
No additional information regarding the patient and/or event has been received since the previous medwatch report was sent.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
NGAGE NITINOL STONE EXTRACTOR
Common Device Name
FFL DISLODGER, STONE, BASKET URETERAL, METAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
jason crouch
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key21527267
Report Number1820334-2025-00214
Device Sequence Number15844183
Product Code FFL
UDI-Device Identifier00827002482944
UDI-Public(01)00827002482944(17)270717(10)16158815
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCN
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Company Representative,Distributor
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 08/12/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberG48294
Device Catalogue NumberNGE-017115
Device Lot Number16158815
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Follow-Up
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/24/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer02/24/2025
07/22/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/05/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date03/26/2025
08/12/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/17/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-