|
|
| Model Number |
44032 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Unspecified Infection (1930)
|
| Date of Event |
01/19/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
On or about (b)(6) 2022, plaintiff underwent placement of the angiodynamics smartport power injectable port, reference number (b)(4), lot number 5737583.The device was implanted by (b)(6), md, at (b)(6), for the purpose of ongoing vein access.On or about (b)(6) 2023, plaintiff presented herself to (b)(6) where her port was subsequently removed due to malfunctioning and an infection.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device is not available to be returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.An investigation into the root cause for the event is currently in progress.The results of the investigation will be sent via a follow up medwatch.Reference: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The customer's reported complaint description of patient infection cannot be confirmed given the patient centric nature of this serious adverse event (sae).It was also reported that the port was malfunctioning, however, no details were provided as to the specific nature of the performance issue, i.E.Port occluded.The port device was likely removed due to the reported patient adverse event of infection.In addition, the end user customer did not report a complaint event to angiodynamics at the time of the port removal, indicating that they did not believe the port malfunction/infection was not a result of the device manufacturing.A device history record (dhr) review of the indicated packaging/assembly lots revealed no quality related issues or manufacturing deficiencies at the time of manufacture.Sterilization load release records were reviewed for the packaging lot in question; no issues were observed.The port was implanted into the patient more than 7 months prior to the patient's infection.The report of port device was "malfunctioning" did not provide a specific failure mode, i.E.Device occluded, which can be a result of port care and maintenance during use.If the manufacturing/packaging/sterilization of the port device in question was to contribute to an infection in the patient it would have likely occurred shortly after the implant date and not more than 7 months later.Device directions for use cautions that each access of the port should be performed using aseptic technique, following the institutions universal precautions.There is no indication from the reported complaint that the manufacturing/packaging/sterilization of the port device could have contributed to the patient's infection.Infection is cautioned in the device dfu as a potential complication of port system use.Labeling review: the direction for use (dfu) provided with the port device contains the following statements: contraindications: · presence of infection, bacteremia, septicemia or peritonitis.Warnings: · the device is to be implanted, used, maintained and removed in accordance with current evidence-based guidance for infection prevention from agencies/organizations such as centers of disease control (cdc) or the world health organization.It is recommended that institutional policies and procedures are updated periodically to reflect current evidence-based guidelines for infection prevention.Precautions: · carefully read and follow all instructions prior to use.· after implantation or usage of the port, the system should be flushed to clear infusates and/or blood components in order to maintain patency.Refer to the "use and maintenance" section of this dfu for recommendations.· if more than one drug is to be administered, between the individual drug applications, flush the system with 5 to 10 ml normal saline for injection to prevent drug interactions potential complications/adverse events: · bacteremia.· catheter thrombosis.· inflammation.· infection.· implantation site necrosis or infection.· thromboembolism.· thrombophlebitis.· tunnel infection.A review of the angiodynamics complaint system noted no adverse trends for this complaint type and product family.This type of complaint continues to be monitored for trends.Reference (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|