|
Batch review performed on 21 february 2025: (b)(4) items manufactured and released on 17-apr-2009.Expiration date: 2014-jan-31.No anomalies found related to the problem.To date, (b)(4) items of the same lot have been sold with no similar reported event during the period of review.Additional implants also revised: gmk-primary 02.07.0034rp patella resurfacing s.2 (new generation) (k090988) lot.104490 batch review performed on 21 february 2025 (b)(4) items manufactured and released on 28-feb-2011.Expiration date: 2016-jan-31.No anomalies found related to the problem.To date, (b)(4) items of the same lot have been sold with no similar reported event during the period of review.Visual inspection performed by r&d department: revision surgery of a gmk primary uc tibial insert after almost 14 years from primary implantation due to pain.During the revision surgery, the surgeon noticed posterior lateral wear of the insert with breakage of the posterior lip.Also, patella component was found loosened and replaced.From the picture of the explanted component, we can notice that the insert is broken in correspondence to the posterior lateral lip.The remaining part of the articular surface doesn't seem to be damaged or overly worn out.Reason for breakage is unknown.Wear and delamination can be a possible explanation.From the evidence in our hands it is not possible to assess if other particular conditions could have played a role in the process of wear, such as residual debris of cement detached from the patella or malrotation of the tibia baseplate.Wear can be expected after 14 years of implantation, but with available evidence, we can't assess that this was actually the real and only cause for the event.From preliminary investigation, there is no evidence that the event is related to a faulty device.
|