|
Minerva surgical conducted an interview with the treating physician on 3/3/2025 to gather additional information.The treating physician noted that the body of the uterus had an approximately 90 degrees rotation along its longitudinal axis, with one cornu being adhered to the anterior abdominal wall.The physician suspects that this rotational change in anatomical position could have been a result of prior surgeries (c-section and surgery on fallopian tube) and suspects this may have been the cause behind the infliction of the perforation.Physician elected to manage the perforation by applying oxidized regenerated cellulose (orc) and bipolar coagulation to control or prevent capillary bleeding.The patient fully recovered and is doing well.Note: possible causes of uterine perforation could be a result of sounding, dilation, or handpiece insertion and was appropriately detected by the uit.The use of orc for a uterine perforation is at the physician's discretion and does not indicate the severity of the perforation.The disposable handpiece used in this case was not returned and therefore a failure analysis of the complaint device could not be performed.Based on the device history review, there were no ncrs, deviations, or rework activity noted in the dhr for this unit or lot number potentially related to the reported failure.The handpieces in this lot met all qa specifications prior to being released, including adequate sterilization.Uterine perforations are known complications of an endometrial ablation procedure.Complications associated with perforations are addressed in the warning and caution sections of the operator's manual and instructions for use, including the statements: use caution not to perforate the uterine wall when sounding, dilating, or inserting the disposable handpiece.Activation of the minerva disposable handpiece in the setting of a uterine perforation is likely to result in serious patient injury.Excessive force applied during placement of the disposable handpiece may result in tissue injury, including perforation.Although designed to detect a perforation of the uterine wall, this test is an indicator only, and it might not detect all perforations.Clinical judgment must always be used.Post-treatment, any patient-reporting signs/symptoms that could indicate a serious complication, e.G., bowel injury, should be thoroughly evaluated without delay.As with all endometrial ablation procedures, serious injury or death can occur, including but not limited to, infection and injury to adjacent tissue, such as bowel, bladder, vagina, vulva, and/or perineum.
|