• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. ULTRAVERSE 035; PTA BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. ULTRAVERSE 035; PTA BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number US3513054
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Bradycardia (1751); Low Blood Pressure/ Hypotension (1914); Vascular Dissection (3160)
Date of Event 01/24/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was reported through the results of the clinical trial that approximately seven months and thirteen days post index procedure, the subject underwent target limb re-intervention on the left superficial femoral artery by using scoring balloon and drug coated balloon.It was further reported that during re-intervention, the subject had an adverse event of dissection in the proximal superficial femoral artery on the left leg.Reportedly, the adverse event was not related to study device and study procedure and the lesion was stented.Furthermore, the subject had an another adverse event of circulatory dysregulation of hypotension and bradycardia after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty.The current status of the patient was unknown.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records will be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported failure as no objective evidence was provided for review.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H11: section a through f: the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported through the results of the clinical trial that approximately seven months and thirteen days post index procedure, the subject underwent target limb re-intervention on the left superficial femoral artery by using scoring balloon and drug coated balloon.It was further reported that during re-intervention, the subject had an adverse event of dissection in the proximal superficial femoral artery on the left leg.Reportedly, the adverse event was not related to study device and study procedure and the lesion was stented.Furthermore, the subject had an another adverse event of circulatory dysregulation of hypotension and bradycardia after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty.The current status of the patient was unknown.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported failure as no objective evidence was provided for review.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.Section a through f ¿ the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported through the results of the clinical trial (agility (b)(4) of a non-commercially available device (bd¿ low profile vascular covered stent (lpvcs)), that approximately seven months and thirteen days post index procedure, the subject underwent target limb re-intervention on the left superficial femoral artery left limb using a commercially available lutonix dcb and ultrascore balloon when an adverse event of dissection occurred.The severity of the adverse event was mild.The adverse event was not related to study device.The adverse event was not related to the study procedure.The lesion was stented.The outcome of the adverse event was resolved/recovered.The subject had another adverse event of circulatory dysregulation- hypotension and bradycardia which occurred after the pta procedure.The severity of the adverse event was mild.The adverse event was not related to study device.The adverse event was not related to the study procedure.Ecg was done and the event was resolved already.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ULTRAVERSE 035
Common Device Name
PTA BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
1625 w 3rd st.
tempe AZ 85281
Manufacturer (Section G)
CLEARSTREAM TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
moyne upper
enniscorthy, co. wexford N A
EI   N A
Manufacturer Contact
brett curtice
800 w. rio salado pkwy
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key21571090
Report Number2020394-2025-00312
Device Sequence Number12997023
Product Code PNO
UDI-Device Identifier00801741116742
UDI-Public(01)00801741116742(17)270728(10)GFJT1538
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryGM
PMA/510(K) Number
K172571
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Study
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 06/18/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUS3513054
Device Lot NumberGFJT1538
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/13/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/14/2025
06/20/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/11/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/19/2025
07/01/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight60 KG
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceWhite
-
-