| Catalog Number |
130-03-735 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Failure of Implant (1924); Joint Laxity (4526)
|
| Date of Event |
02/10/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional reporting on this event will be provided as a supplemental report to this document as soon as it becomes available.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Revision surgery: due to patella pegs sheered of patella and patella became loose in knee.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
See d4 expiration date, h4, h10 and h11.Complaint has been evaluated and is similar to report number 1644408-2022-00767; 130-03-735, s807 - pain/s801 device cracked/broke, revision surgery.If additional information regarding the reported event is submitted at a future date, this investigation will be re-evaluated.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
See d4 expiration date, h4, h10 removed related report number and h11 updated evaluation the agent reported "(patella pegs sheered of patella and patella became loose in knee.Male 57 yrs)." the previous surgery and the surgery detailed in this event occurred 6.8 years apart.The reported device was returned to surgical and examination confirmed; the pegs are sheared off, pegs not returned.The surgery was completed as intended and without incident.If additional information regarding the reported event is submitted at a future date, this investigation will be re-evaluated.There was no information submitted with this complaint about any patient activities, accidents, or medical contraindications that may have contributed to the reported event.There were no findings during this evaluation that indicate that the reported device(s) was defective.The surgeon performed this procedure to remedy the patient's condition.No further action is deemed necessary.A review of the device history record(s) show that the reported component(s) used in the previous surgery, when released for use, met design and manufacturing requirements.There were no nonconforming material reports associated with the product(s) that may have contributed to the reported event.The device(s) was verified to have gone through an acceptable sterilization process and was within its expiration date at the time of the previous surgery.Customer complaint history of the reported device(s) showed no present trends or on-going issues that are needing a review.This is the 1st complaint against the part/lot number combination.Inventory containment is not required as there are no indications of a product or process issue affecting implant safety or effectiveness.The revision surgery was completed successfully.The root cause of this complaint was a revision surgery due to the patella pegs sheered off and became loose.No information was submitted with the complaint regarding pre-existing conditions of the patient or any activities the patient was involved in that may have contributed to the event.There are multiple factors that may contribute to an event that are outside of the control of djo surgical.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|