|
|
| Model Number |
DIU225 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
02/24/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the preloaded johnson and johnson (jnj) intraocular lens (iol) was implanted in the patient¿s eye.The iol had a defect in the patient¿s view.The doctor was able to fold the lens and then remove it.Reportedly, the customer saved the iol in a sterile specimen cup to return to johnson and johnson.No further information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Section d4, model and catalog number: partial diu iol information provided due to the unknown serial number.Section d4, expiration date: unknown as the serial number was not provided.Section d4, unique identifier (udi) number: a partial udi was provided as the serial number is not available.Section d6a, if implanted, give date: not applicable as the iol was removed during the same procedure.Section d6b, if explanted, give date: not applicable as the iol was removed during the same procedure.Therefore, not explanted.Section h3, device evaluated by manufacturer: the device has not been returned for evaluation.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Section h4 device manufacture date: unknown as the serial number was not provided.Attempts have been made to obtain the missing information.However, to date, it has not been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: through follow-up the customer provided additional details.This current report is to provide this information.The photos mentioned by the reporter were requested, however, the reporter responded that they are blurry and don't really show much.The serial number of the suspect product is (b)(6) and it¿s available for return to johnson and johnson.The operative eye is the right eye.The customer also confirmed that the iol was removed and replaced within the same procedure.The procedure was completed with a backup iol of the same model and diopter.The date of the event is 2/24/2025.The customer confirmed there was no capsule tear, no vitrectomy and no sutures required.The patient¿s date of birth is (b)(6) 1960.Sex is male.The customer indicated the patient¿s gender is ¿male¿.Patient¿s weight is 82.1kilograms.Section a2 age or date of birth: age is 64, date of birth is (b)(6) 1960.Section a3a, sex: male.Section a3b, gender: the customer indicated the patient¿s gender is ¿male¿.Section a4, patient weight: 82.1 kilograms.Section b3, date of event: 2/24/2025.Section d4, catalog number diu225u165.Section d4, additional device information serial number (b)(6).Section d4, expiration date: jul 10, 2027.Section d4, primary unique device identification (udi) number: (b)(4).Section h4, device manufacture date: jul 10, 2024.Section h6, health effect-impact code: 4631is being used to capture the removal and replacement of the iol.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The report follow-up #1 should have included the following information.This current report provides the correction below.Section d4, model number: diu225.Section d4, expiration date: jul 10, 2027.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information.Section d9: device available for evaluation? yes section d9: date returned to manufacturer: jun 12, 2025 section h3: evaluated by manufacturer? yes.Device evaluation: the complaint lens was received.Visual inspection under magnification reveal the complaint lens was received coated in viscoelastic residue.The lens was cleaned revealing no issues that could cause or contribute to the complaint issue reported.No handpiece was received for evaluation.Based on the complaint investigation results, the product was released within specifications.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency, and the reported issue could not be verified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|