|
This regulatory report is being submitted due to retrospective review through capa 624392.H3: product analysis found visually, there was no damage in the construction of the device.The packaging carton and pouch were not returned with the device.Electrically, resistance of the entire assembly shall be less than 0.3 ohms and the actual measurement was 0.3 ohms which was in specification.The probe tip fit securely into the handle with no issues.Functionally, the device was connected to a nim system using a 1.0ma stimulating current and 100v threshold and, while stimulating with a patient simulator, the system consistently returned 1.0ma and a waveform/event tone over 200v.There was no intermittent behavior while manipulating the tip, connector, or the wire.In the returned condition, there was no out of specification condition that was related to the complaint.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
|
It was reported that during thyroidectomy, when the doctor used the probe to detect the nerve, nim didn't respond until two seconds later.The doctor tried to reconnect the probe but useless.The stim return show 3 ma.After 30 minutes, the probe suddenly was back to normal.The procedure was completed with backup product.No delay in the procedure.There was no patient impact.
|