|
It was reported, during an ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy procedure, on the 3rd pass, the basket of an ncircle tipless stone extractor, went in and out of the scope with a stone, and the wire that connects to the basket, detached/broke off from the handle, rendering the product useless.It was used for maybe 30 seconds before it broke.Use of the device was discontinued.The rep assumed, the procedure was completed with another same type device.No section of the device remained inside the patient's body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.The complainant has not reported any adverse effects on the patient due to this occurrence.
|
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unchanged, or unavailable.Correction: h6, annex a and g.Summary of event: it was reported, during an ureteroscopy with laser lithotripsy procedure, on the 3rd pass, the basket of an ncircle tipless stone extractor, went in and out of the scope with a stone, and the wire that connects to the basket, detached/broke off from the handle, rendering the product useless.It was used for maybe 30 seconds before it broke.Use of the device was discontinued.The rep assumed, the procedure was completed with another same type device.No section of the device remained inside the patient's body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.The complainant has not reported any adverse effects on the patient due to this occurrence.Investigation evaluation: reviews of the complaint history, device history record (dhr), instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions, and quality control procedures were conducted during the investigation.The complaint device was not returned to cook for investigation.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device history record did not find any relevant non-conformances.A review of complaint history found no additional complaints for this lot number.The product ifu states: precautions.Do not use excessive force to manipulate this device.Damage to the device may occur.How supplied upon removal from the package, inspect the product to ensure no damage has occurred.A review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.The information provided upon review of the dmr, dhr, ifu, and complaint file suggests that there is evidence the device was manufactured to specification.There is no evidence of non-conforming devices in-house or in the field.Based on the information provided and the results of the investigation, cook has concluded that the specific nature and cause of the reported issue could not be established as the complaint device was not returned.The risk analysis for this failure mode was reviewed and no additional escalation was required.The appropriate personnel have been notified, and cook will continue to monitor for similar events.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|