|
|
| Catalog Number |
0112750 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Adhesion(s) (1695); Hernia (2240)
|
| Date of Event |
10/02/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Per information provided by patient¿s attorney and review of patient medical records: (b)(6)2015 - patient was diagnosed with right inguinal hernia thereby underwent open repair with the implant of perfix plug (device #1) on (b)(6)2015.Per operative notes, ¿the hernia sac was dissected free of the surrounding structures and reduced.A perfix plug (device #1) was placed and secured with sutures.The floor was reinforced using the onlay patch.¿ (b)(6)2017 - patient was diagnosed with left inguinal hernia thereby underwent open repair with the implant of perfix plug (device #2).Per operative notes, ¿the hernia sac was dissected free of the surrounding structures and reduced.A perfix plug (device #2) was placed and secured with sutures.The floor was reinforced using the onlay patch.¿ (b)(6)2018 - patient was diagnosed with right inguinal hernia, neuralgia thereby underwent open repair with the implant of perfix plug (device #3), lysis of adhesion and explant of perfix plug (device #1).Per operative notes, ¿old mesh (device #1) was encountered, significant contraction of the mesh was noted.Deeper scar tissue appeared ilioinguinal nerve and this was divided laterally.The patch and the plug (device #1) adjacent to the cord was removed.A sheet of mesh (device #3) had placed over the floor around the cord and sutured.¿ (b)(6)2018 - patient was diagnosed with right inguinal hernia thereby underwent robotic assisted laparoscopic repair with the implant of 3dmax light mesh (device #4).Per operative notes, ¿laparoscopic lysis of adhesion was performed.The direct hernia was noted, preperitoneal space was completely freed.A 3dmax light mesh (device #4) was placed at copper¿s ligament and sutured.¿ attorney alleges that the patient had mesh migration, mesh shrinkage, nerve damage, pain, hernia recurrence and emotional injuries.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Based on the information provided, no conclusions can be made.Per medical records review, about 8 months post implant of perfix plug, patient was diagnosed with hernia recurrence, adhesions thereby underwent repair.The instructions-for-use supplied with the device lists hernia recurrence, adhesions as possible complications.Review of manufacturing records confirms product was manufactured to specification.Note, the manufacturing date (15-feb-2017) is considered to be a best estimate.This emdr represents the bard/davol perfix plug (device #3).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol perfix plug (device #1).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|