• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 PIPELINE FLEX W/SHIELD TECHNOLOGY; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM FLOW DIVERTER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 PIPELINE FLEX W/SHIELD TECHNOLOGY; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM FLOW DIVERTER Back to Search Results
Model Number PED2-500-35
Medical Device Problem Code Activation Failure (3270)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 03/11/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
Medtronic received a report that during the treatment of intracranial aneurysm, after the microcatheter was in place, it was measured and the 5-35 stent was selected.After the stent was pushed, the tip end could not be anchored.After multiple attempts to open and adjust the deployment position, it still could not be anchored, so the stent was withdrawn and the operation was rescheduled.The device and any accessories were prepared as indicated in the ifu.The pipeline was used for an indication that is not approved (off-label), the location of the aneurysm was not within the indications.No patient symptoms or further complications were reported as a result of this event.The patient was undergoing surgery for treatment of a fusiform, unruptured vertebral artery aneurysm with a max diameter of 8 mm and a 20 mm neck diameter.The landing zone was 5.0 mm distally and 5.3 mm proximally.It was noted the patient's vessel tortuosity was minimal.Dual antiplatelet therapy (dapt) was administered.Angiographic result post procedure was no change.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event or Problem Description
Additional information received reported the cause of the pipeline failure to open was not determined.The device was in a straight vessel segment when the failure to open occurred.The pipeline was retrieved and redeployed to try and open the stent without success.No other steps or devices were reported to be used to open the pipeline.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
B5 updated with additional information received.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event or Problem Description
Additional information was received reporting that there was no device issue with the phenom catheter.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis # (b)(4): equipment used: video inspection system (m-85519), camera (panasonic lumix dmc-zs5); ruler (m-83361).Drawing(s) referenced: n/a as found condition: the pipeline flex shield was returned inside a biohazard bag, and a shipping box.Visual inspection/damage location details: the distal and proximal dps restraints were found to be intact.The dps sleeves were found intact with no signs of damage.The distal hypotube and ptfe shrink tubing were found to be intact with no signs of elongation.The braid's distal and proximal ends were found opened and frayed.No bends were found with the pushwire.No defects were found with the tip coil, distal marker, re-sheathing marker, re-sheathing pad, or the proximal bumper.No other anomalies were observed.Testing/analysis: n/a.Conclusion: based on the device analysis and reported information, the customer report of ¿failure/incomplete open distal¿ was not confirmed as the braid's distal and proximal ends were found opened and frayed.The cause of the ¿failure/incomplete open¿ could not be determined.Possible causes of ¿failure/incomplete open¿ include vessel tortuosity, damaged braid, and deployment of the braid in the vessel bend.However, the customer indicated that vessel tortuosity was normal, and the braid was not positioned in the vessel bend, which eliminates these factors out as potential causes.It is possible that the damaged braid may have contributed to the failure to open issue.Braid damage can result from resheathing more than 2 times, over-manipulation, deployment technique, resistance encountered when advancing or retracting the delivery wire or deploying/re-sheathing the braid against resistance.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PIPELINE FLEX W/SHIELD TECHNOLOGY
Common Device Name
INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM FLOW DIVERTER
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
justin ellis
9775 toledo way
irvine, CA 92618
7635265677
MDR Report Key21606038
Report Number2029214-2025-00666
Device Sequence Number8868218
Product Code OUT
UDI-Device Identifier00763000284756
UDI-Public00763000284756
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCH
PMA/510(K) Number
P100018
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2025
Device Explanted Year2025
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/06/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberPED2-500-35
Device Catalogue NumberPED2-500-35
Device Lot NumberB699213
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/11/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer03/18/2025
04/19/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/14/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date04/03/2025
05/06/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/29/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-