• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AVANOS MEDICAL INC AVANOS; MICROCUFF* PEDIATRIC ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE, ORAL/NASAL MAGILL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AVANOS MEDICAL INC AVANOS; MICROCUFF* PEDIATRIC ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE, ORAL/NASAL MAGILL Back to Search Results
Model Number 35115
Medical Device Problem Codes Material Integrity Problem (2978); Material Twisted/Bent (2981)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 01/14/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The product involved in the report has not been returned.A review of the device history record is in-progress.All information reasonably known as of 14 march 2025 has been included in the health authority report.Should additional information be obtained a follow-up health authority report will be provided.The information provided by airlife.Represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to airlife.Airlife has no independent knowledge of the event reported but is relaying the information that was provided by the user facility where the incident occurred.This product incident is documented in the airlife complaint database and is identified as complaint (b)(4).This information is submitted pursuant to 21cfr803, in compliance with the medical device reporting requirement and should not be considered to be an admission that a airlife product is defective or causes serious injury.
 
Event or Problem Description
Respiratory control was fine prior and during surgery.After returning to the room, the patient's ventilation rate did not increase, and although bag ventilation was performed manually,the airflow was not going well.Therefore extubated the patient.The micro cuff was found to be kinked at 8 cm from the tip.This was the first time this had happened, as the micro cuff usually does not remain bent during intraoperative x-rays.At the time of recovery of the product in question, the mark of the bent portion could not be confirmed by the naked eye.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The product involved in the report has not been returned.A review of the device history record is in-progress.All information reasonably known as of 14 march 2025 has been included in the health authority report.Should additional information be obtained a follow-up health authority report will be provided.The information provided by airlife.Represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to airlife.Airlife has no independent knowledge of the event reported but is relaying the information that was provided by the user facility where the incident occurred.This product incident is documented in the airlife complaint database and is identified as complaint - (b)(4).This information is submitted pursuant to 21cfr803, in compliance with the medical device reporting requirement and should not be considered to be an admission that a airlife product is defective or causes serious injury.Complaint was considered not confirmed based on customer narrative of events and images provided.A 24 month review was conducted and no additional complaints were identified related to this issue, therefore no trend was observed.The lot number was provided not; the vendor was notified of the incident.This incident was not identified as an increasing trend.No further action to be taken.
 
Event or Problem Description
Respiratory control was fine prior and during surgery.After returning to the room, the patient's ventilation rate did not increase, and although bag ventilation was performed manually,the airflow was not going well.Therefore extubated the patient.The micro cuff was found to be kinked at 8 cm from the tip.This was the first time this had happened, as the micro cuff usually does not remain bent during intraoperative x-rays.At the time of recovery of the product in question, the mark of the bent portion could not be confirmed by the naked eye.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AVANOS
Common Device Name
MICROCUFF* PEDIATRIC ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE, ORAL/NASAL MAGILL
Manufacturer (Section D)
AVANOS MEDICAL INC
5405 windward parkway
alpharetta GA 30004
Manufacturer (Section G)
AVANOS MEDICAL, INC.
5405 windward parkway
alpharetta GA 30004
Manufacturer Contact
melissa brickley
2710 northridge dr nw suite a
grand rapids, MI 49544
6162598415
MDR Report Key21612809
Report Number3011270181-2025-02001
Device Sequence Number7662665
Product Code BTR
UDI-Device Identifier00609038351155
UDI-Public(01)00609038351155
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryJA
PMA/510(K) Number
K080821
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/22/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model Number35115
Device Catalogue Number35115
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 01/14/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer01/14/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/14/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/22/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-