|
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 PowerPort M.R.I. Implantable Port, Silicone Single-Lumen, Kit, 9.6F; Port & Catheter, Implanted, subcutaneous, Intravascular
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
1809601 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Material Twisted/Bent (2981); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Bacterial Infection (1735); Unspecified Infection (1930)
|
| Date of Event |
04/26/2015
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records will be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.H11: section a through f ¿ the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through litigation process that sometime later port placement procedure, the patient allegedly developed infection.However, the current status of the patient is unknown.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this product and lot.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No medical records were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported infection as no objective evidence was provided for review.Furthermore, the clinical conditions alleged in the complaint cannot be confirmed.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through litigation process that sometime later port placement procedure, the patient allegedly developed infection.However, the current status of the patient is unknown.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through the litigation process that, on (b)(6) 2015, a patient underwent port placement via the left subclavian vein for chemotherapy related to breast cancer.Approximately thirty days later, on (b)(6) 2015, the patient was diagnosed with pseudomonas aeruginosa bacterial infection.Approximately one month and two days later, on (b)(6) 2015, it was reported that the catheter had coiled around.Subsequently, on (b)(6) 2015, the port was removed.However, the current status of the patient was unknown.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was not required as this is the only complaint reported to date for this lot.Investigation summary: although the sample was not returned for evaluation, medical records were provided and reviewed.Medical alleged that the patient underwent an implantable port placement procedure via left subclavian vein using a power port for delivery of chemotherapy as part of breast cancer treatment.Procedure was completed under fluoroscopic guidance.Approximately after thirty days patient was diagnosed with pseudomonas aeruginosa.Approximately after thirty two days later patient was reported with catheter coiled around.After six days planned for port removal and port was removed and incision was closed.Therefore, it can be confirmed that the catheter had twisted and coiled and patient had experienced pseudomonas aeruginosa.However, the infection relationship to the port is unknown.Furthermore, the clinical conditions alleged in the complaint cannot be confirmed.A review of sterilization records, endotoxin testing results, and bioburden data was conducted in accordance with applicable quality system and regulatory requirements, and no nonconformances or anomalies were identified.Based upon available information, the definitive root cause was unknown.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.B3, b5, g3, h6 (patient, device, component, method, result)
section a through f: the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|