• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ARJOHUNTLEIGH POLSKA SP. Z O.O. ENTERPRISE 9000X; BED, AC-POWERED ADJUSTABLE HOSPITAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ARJOHUNTLEIGH POLSKA SP. Z O.O. ENTERPRISE 9000X; BED, AC-POWERED ADJUSTABLE HOSPITAL Back to Search Results
Model Number 9814DF101BCUSB
Medical Device Problem Code Use of Device Problem (1670)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Fall (1848); Hip Fracture (2349)
Date of Event 02/13/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device was evaluated by a third party.The error code e102 was noted (a stable weight reading was not obtained).It has been concluded that the root cause of the bed exit alarm not working properly was due to the scale's inaccurate weighing.The alarm detects patient¿s movements, however it will not restrain the patient from leaving the bed.The circumstances of the patient¿s fall are not known.Instruction for use (ifu - 746-591-en) includes below information about patient fall risk: "to reduce the risk of injury due to falls, lower the bed to minimum height when the patient is unattended." ifu also states: "the patient movement detection function should be checked periodically for correct operation and before each new patient uses the bed." "before using patient movement detection, verify that the alarm can be easily heard by caregivers, e.G.At the nurse's station." the reported alarm malfunction did not lead to the patient's fall.The alarm detects patient's movementsm however, it will not restrain patient from leaving the bed.The root cause could not be confirmed.The circumstances of the event are not known, therefore it is unknown why the patient fell from the bed.To sum up, arjo device was used for a patient treatment when the event occurred and from that perspective it played a role in the event.The device did not meet specification as the alarm failure was observed.This complaint is reportable due to allegation of patient's fall from the bed resulting in a serious injury.
 
Event or Problem Description
Arjo was notified of an event involving an enterprise 9000x bed.It was reported that a bed exit alarm did not work properly, and the patient fell from the bed.As a result of the fall, the patient broke their hip.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ENTERPRISE 9000X
Common Device Name
BED, AC-POWERED ADJUSTABLE HOSPITAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
ARJOHUNTLEIGH POLSKA SP. Z O.O.
ul. ks. piotra wawrzyniaka 2
komorniki PL-62 052
PL  PL-62052
Manufacturer (Section G)
ARJOHUNTLEIGH POLSKA SP. Z O.O.
ul. ks. piotra wawrzyniaka 2
komorniki PL-62 052
PL   PL-62052
Manufacturer Contact
justyna kielbowska
ks. wawrzyniaka 2
komorniki 62-05-2
PL   62-052
883337089
MDR Report Key21617260
Report Number3007420694-2025-00068
Device Sequence Number6828325
Product Code FNL
UDI-Device Identifier05055982755207
UDI-Public(01)05055982755207(11)181212
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMN
Initial Reporter CountryUS
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 03/17/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Model Number9814DF101BCUSB
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/24/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/17/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/12/2018
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) No
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-