|
Manufacturer's ref.No: (b)(4).Information regarding patient weight, height, medical history, race, and ethnicity was not reported.Section d4: udi: as the lot number for the device involved in the event was not provided, the full udi is currently not available.Section h4: the device manufacture date is not known as the device lot number is not available / not reported.The device was discarded; therefore, no further investigation can be performed.The device lot number was not available.The manufacturing documentation review could not be performed without the lot number.With the information available and without the product available for analysis, the reported customer complaint could not be confirmed.The exact cause of the event could not be determined; however, there are circumstances of the procedure that may have contributed to the reported failure.Catheter obstruction while-in patient with loss of cerebral target position is a known potential complication associated with the prowler select plus microcatheter.The instructions for use (ifu) contain the following caution: ¿if strong resistance is met during manipulation, discontinue the procedure and determine the cause of resistance before proceeding.If the cause of resistance cannot be determined, withdraw the catheter and guidewire as a system.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended to identify statistical signals for consideration of further correction action.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.Missing information from this report is identified as blank; this information was not provided in the reported event or available at the time of report submission.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803 (and/or part 4, as applicable).This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by cerenovus, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, cerenovus, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
As reported by the field, during an endovascular embolization, an enterprise2 4mmx16mm no tip intracranial stent (encr401600, 8697618) became impeded in the proximal of a prowler select plus 150/5cm microcatheter (606s255x, lot unknown) and could not advance any more.The doctor removed the stent and microcatheter from the patient and switched to new devices to complete the procedure.There was no patient injury reported.
|
|
Manufacturer ref#: (b)(4).Updated sections on this medwatch: b4, b5, g6, h2, and h11.Section b5: additional event information received on 19-mar-2025 indicted that the correct procedure type performed was an angioplasty and not endovascular embolization.A supplemental report will be submitted if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.
|