|
Tw#(b)(4).Updated fields: b4, d9, g3, g6, h2, h3, h6 (type of investigation, investigation findings and investigation conclusions), h11.The device was returned to the factory for evaluation on 03/13/2025.An investigation was conducted on 03/19/2025.A visual inspection was conducted.Signs of clinical use and evidence of blood was observed.There were no visual defects observed on the bipolar blades.There were no visual defects observed on the intact cutter blade.There were no visual defects observed on the intact c-ring.The blue toggle was manipulated to retract and extend the cutter blade.There were no visual defects observed on the intact cutter blade.An electrical evaluation was conducted.A pre-cautery test was performed and repeated 10 times over a 10 minute period according to the procedure in the instructions for use (cv000001597).The device failed the pre-cautery test with a reference generator (recommended setting of 18) and reference bipolar cord.The bipolar cord connection was manipulated during activation.The device did not produce steam and the saline did not ¿boil¿ on the test gauze each time.Based on the returned condition of the device as well as the evaluation results, the reported failure "electrical problem" was confirmed.An engineer evaluation was conducted.The complaint was confirmed.The bisector was inspected under magnification.It was observed that the bisector shaft had significant heat damage.The bisector shaft was removed and it was observed that one of the wires leading to the electrode had been damaged and severed.Based on the returned condition of the device as well as the engineer evaluation, the reported failure "electrical problem" was confirmed.The lot # 3000423001 history record review was completed.There was one (01) ncmr, rework, or deviations documented for the reported lot number.Based on the dhr/lhr review results, it was determined that there is no relation between the batch manufacturing process and the reported failure.
|