| Catalog Number |
297531040 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Device-Device Incompatibility (2919)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
02/21/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that after 85mm body and 40mm neck had been torqued together, the neck still spun on the proximal body trial.This made dislocating the hip after trialing difficult.There was 2 minutes of surgical delay.There was no patient consequences.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy orthopaedics is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy orthopaedics has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy orthopaedics or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy orthopaedics, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.Additional narrative: if information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary: according to the information received, " it was reported that after 85mm body and 40mm neck had been torqued together, the neck still spun on the proximal body trial.This made dislocating the hip after trialing difficult." the product was not returned to medtech orthopaedics, however photos were provided for review.See attachment ¿(b)(4) device photo ad (b)(6) 2025 and (b)(4) device photo ad (b)(6) 2025 - 1.¿ the photo investigation did not reveal that reclaim prox neck trl 40mm (297531040) had any assembly or lock-unlock issue.The evidence provided was not sufficient to confirm the reported event.Functionality issues cannot be evaluated through photo investigation.As the device was not returned, an as-received condition could not be assessed, and a dimensional inspection and document/specification review were not completed.The overall complaint was not confirmed as the observed condition of the reclaim prox neck trl 40mm would not contribute to the complaint about the device issue.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition.As part of medtech orthopaedics quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device history lot: the product investigation found no evidence suspecting an error in the manufacturing or material that would be a contributing factor in the reported allegation(s).A manufacturing records evaluation (mre) was not performed.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H11 additional narrative: added: b5.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Additional information received stating, "no surgical delay.There were no patient consequence.".
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|