• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL GALAXY G3; NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL GALAXY G3; NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION DEVICE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number GLM915025
Medical Device Problem Code Failure to Advance (2524)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 02/10/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint#: (b)(4).The purpose of this mdr submission is to report the findings of the device investigation.The embolic coil was stretched, meeting regulatory reporting criteria.Information regarding patient weight, height, medical history, race, and ethnicity was not reported.Section d2b ¿ procode: krd/hcg.A non-sterile galaxy g3 mini 1.5mm x 2.5cm was received contained in the decontamination pouch.Upon receiving the device, a visual inspection was performed, and it was noted that the core wire was kinked and protruding from the introducer.The coil component was inspected under microscopic magnification, and it was found severely stretched; this remains attached to the resistance heating (rh) and is still in one piece.The rh was found not softened, indicating that the detachment process was not initiated.The issue regarding a coil being unable to be pushed into microcatheter was confirmed since the damages noted in the coil prevent the ability to move the coil.Coil stretching is a known potential issue associated with the use of this device.The instructions for use (ifu) provide proper handling instructions for the device to prevent such issues from occurring.According to the risk documentation, friction and difficulty to advance are potential issues that can occur during microcoil placement due to continuous saline flush not being established, which can result in coil stretching.The damages observed in the coil were not originally documented in the complaint; however, it could be the result of the difficulty experienced during the procedure that could not be replicated in the laboratory.There is no indication that the issue reported is a result of a defect inherently related to the device.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed, and no non-conformance's related to the reported complaint condition were identified.As part of j&j medtech quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Devices undergo 100% inspection at final assembly for coil condition to prevent coil damage from leaving the facility.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no capa activity is required.It should be noted that multiple factors could cause product failure.The instructions for use (ifu) does contain the following recommendations: if unusual friction is noticed during advancement or retraction of the microcoil system through the introducer, open the rhv main valve, and partially withdraw the distal end of the introducer to expose its tip within the rhv.Tighten the rhv main valve and flush the y-connector of the rhv with sterile saline and verify that fluid exits the slit in the clear portion of the introducer.If unusual friction is still noticed during advancement or retraction of the microcoil system, verify flush lines are open and properly pressurized.Then slowly withdraw the entire microcoil system and examine for damage.Replace it with a new microcoil system.If friction still exists, withdraw and examine the delivery catheter system.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended to identify statistical signals for consideration of further correction action.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.Missing information from this report is identified as blank; this information was not provided in the reported event or available at the time of report submission.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803 (and/or part 4, as applicable).This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by cerenovus, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, cerenovus, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event or Problem Description
As reported by the field, during a coil embolization, a galaxy g3 mini 1.5mm x 2.5cm coil (glm915025, 30937886) became impeded in introducer and could not be pushed into microcatheter (mc).The doctor only retracted the coil alone and switched a new one to complete the surgery.The microcatheter was not replaced.There was no patient injury reported.No additional information is available.Based on the product analysis, the embolic coil was found stretched.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GALAXY G3
Common Device Name
NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL
chemin-blanc 38
le locle neuchatel CH-24 00
SZ  CH-2400
Manufacturer (Section G)
CERENOVUS INC. (FREMONT)
47709 fremont blvd
fremont CA 94538
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
31 technology dr
irvine, CA 92618
3035526892
MDR Report Key21642968
Report Number3008114965-2025-00239
Device Sequence Number18045909
Product Code KRD
UDI-Device Identifier10886704080121
UDI-Public(01)10886704080121(17)250930(10)30937886
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCH
PMA/510(K) Number
K171862
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 03/19/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/30/2025
Device Catalogue NumberGLM915025
Device Lot Number30937886
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/06/2025
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/12/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/19/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured10/25/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-