• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: LUTONIX, INC LUTONIX 035AV DRUG COATED PTA DILATION CATHETER; DRUG COATED BALLOON PTA CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

LUTONIX, INC LUTONIX 035AV DRUG COATED PTA DILATION CATHETER; DRUG COATED BALLOON PTA CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number 9010
Medical Device Problem Codes Restricted Flow rate (1248); Obstruction of Flow (2423); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Obstruction/Occlusion (2422); Embolism/Embolus (4438); Thrombosis/Thrombus (4440); Restenosis (4576)
Date of Event 02/20/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records will be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for inspection/evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow-up report will be submitted as applicable.H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported through the results of a clinical trial that approximately eight months and three days post index procedure using a drug-coated balloon catheter in the brachial vein target lesion, the subject had an adverse event of low access and difficult cannulation due to total occlusion.It was further reported that the adverse event was not related to device and procedure but definitely related to av access circuit.However, re-intervention was performed and standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty was used in re-intervention on the target lesion.Furthermore, the re-intervention was successful and the current status of the patient was unknown.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported through the results of a clinical trial that approximately eight months and three days post index procedure using a drug-coated balloon catheter in the brachial vein target lesion, the subject had an adverse event of low access and difficult cannulation due to total occlusion.It was further reported that the adverse event was not related to device and procedure but definitely related to av access circuit.However, re-intervention was performed and standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty was used in re-intervention on the target lesion.It was further reported that approximately nine months and four days post index procedure, the subject had an adverse event of left avf revision hemodialysis due to collateralization and stenosis.Reportedly, the severity of the adverse event was moderate and recovered.The adverse event was not related to study device and procedure but definitely related to av access circuit.On the same day, the subject underwent av access circuit re-intervention on the target left arm for pulling clots.Furthermore, thrombectomy/thrombolysis and surgical revision of brachiocephalic av fistula revision was performed on the target lesion on cephalic vein and access thrombosis on the cephalic vein.Reportedly, the re-intervention was successful and the current status of the patient was unknown.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported failure as no objective evidence was provided for review.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H10: g3, h6 (patient, method, component).H11: b1, b5, d4 (unique identifier (udi) #).H11: section a through f: the information provide by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported failure as no objective evidence was provided for review.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.B5, g3, h6 (patient, device).Section a through f: the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported through the results of a clinical trial that approximately eight months and three days post index procedure using a drug coated balloon catheter in the brachial vein target lesion, the subject had an adverse event of low access and difficult cannulation due to total occlusion.It was further reported that the adverse event was not related to device and procedure but definitely related to av access circuit.However, re intervention was performed and standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty was used in re-intervention on the target lesion.It was further reported that approximately nine months and four days post index procedure, the subject had an adverse event of left avf revision hemodialysis due to collateralization and stenosis.Reportedly, the severity of the adverse event was moderate and recovered.The adverse event was not related to study device and procedure but definitely related to av access circuit.On the same day, the subject underwent av access circuit re intervention on the target left arm for pulling clots.Furthermore, thrombectomy/thrombolysis and surgical revision of brachiocephalic av fistula revision was performed on the target lesion on cephalic vein and access thrombosis on the cephalic vein.Reportedly, the re intervention was successful.Additional information was received and it was reported that the subject had adverse event of low access flow.The relativity of the adverse event is not related to the device and procedure but definitely related to the av access circuit and the re-intervention was performed.However, the current status of the patient was unknown.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LUTONIX 035AV DRUG COATED PTA DILATION CATHETER
Common Device Name
DRUG COATED BALLOON PTA CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
LUTONIX, INC
9409 science center dr
new hope MN 55428
Manufacturer (Section G)
C.R. BARD, INC. (GFO)
289 bay road
queensbury 12804
Manufacturer Contact
brett curtice
800 w. rio salado pkwy
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key21649759
Report Number3006513822-2025-00019
Device Sequence Number9245849
Product Code PRC
UDI-Device Identifier00801741135439
UDI-Public(01)00801741135439(11)240411(17)270228(10)GFHZ1709
Combination Product (Y/N)Y
Initial Reporter StateMI
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P170003
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Study
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/04/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model Number9010
Device Catalogue NumberLX3575760V
Device Lot NumberGFHZ1709
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/20/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/29/2025
04/02/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/20/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/02/2025
04/08/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured04/11/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age66 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight61 KG
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceBlack Or African American
-
-