• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS TECNIS ODYSSEY TORIC II IOL; LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS TECNIS ODYSSEY TORIC II IOL; LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR Back to Search Results
Model Number DRT225
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section a2, a3, a4, a5 and a6: unknown, as information was requested but not provided.Section d6a: if implanted, give date: n/a, as lens was removed/replaced during the same procedure.Section d6b: if explanted, give date: n/a, as lens was removed/replaced during the same procedure.Section e1 - email address: unknown, as information was requested but not provided.Section e1 - telephone number: (b)(6).Device evaluation: product testing could not be performed since the device was not returned for evaluation.Therefore, the reported issue could not be verified, and no product quality deficiency could be identified.Manufacturing records review: the manufacturing records for the product were reviewed.The product was manufactured and released according to specification.A search of complaints related to this production order (po) was performed.The search revealed that no additional complaints were received for this po.No escalation required.Conclusion: based on the complaint investigation results, no product deficiency or product malfunction were found.An attempt has been made to obtain missing information.However, to date, no response has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that when the preloaded toric intraocular lens (iol) was set and implanted, several dot-like cracks were found in the center of the optic under a microscope.The preloaded device setting and implantation were normal, and the physician did not feel any resistance.The iol was removed and the procedure was completed successfully with a replacement device.No patient injury was reported.No medical intervention was required.No further information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Corrected data: upon further review it was noted that section g4: pma/510(k) number in the initial mdr was inadvertently submitted missing the "p" before the numerical value.The complete number is p980040.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS ODYSSEY TORIC II IOL
Common Device Name
LENS, MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO MANUFACTURING NETHERLANDS
van swietenlaan 5
groningen, groningen 9728 NX
NL  9728 NX
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key21665681
Report Number3012236936-2025-000071
Device Sequence Number7755884
Product Code MFK
UDI-Device Identifier05050474811942
UDI-Public(01)05050474811942(17)270722
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryJA
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 01/09/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberDRT225
Device Catalogue NumberDRT2250200
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/27/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer12/15/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/21/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date01/09/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/22/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-