|
This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803 (and/or part 4, as applicable).This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
It was reported that patient underwent revision surgery and hardware removal on (b)(6) 2025.On (b)(6) 2024, a 4.5mm lcp curved condylar plate was placed in order to treat a distal femur fracture with intraarticular extension.The plate reached a point of mechanical failure approximately on (b)(6) 2025, leading to nonunion.The broken plate and intact screws were removed from the patient and a retrograde femoral nail was inserted during the revision procedure.There was no patient consequence, no surgical delay.
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H3, h6: photo investigation the photo was returned to j&j medtech orthopaedics for evaluation.The j&j medtech orthopaedics team conducted a visual inspection of the returned photo from attachment ((b)(4)]).Visual analysis of the photo revealed that the 4.5 lcp curved cond pl 12 holes/278-rt is seen broken in two pieces, all pieces are seen in the pictures.With the information provided is not possible to determine a potential cause at this moment.The mode of failure of the device is multi-factorial and consideration must be given to all other potential influences such as surgical process, patient variables (e.G.Activity level and use), anatomical considerations and patient changes over time.Any conclusions from the investigational input provided have to be placed into context with all other relevant factors.As the device was not returned, an as-received condition could not be assessed, and a dimensional inspection and document/specification review were not completed.As part of j&j medtech orthopaedics quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.The overall complaint was confirmed for 4.5 lcp curved cond pl 12 holes/278-rt.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device history review (dhr): (b)(6) 2025 by: (b)(4).Part number: 02.001.322-us.Lot number: 54p2640.Part manufacture date: 14-may-2020.Manufacturing location: elmira.Part expiration date: n/a.Nonconformance noted: n/a.Dhr record review: a review of the device history record revealed no complaint related anomalies.The device history record shows this lot of 4.5mm lcp curved condylar was processed through the normal manufacturing and inspection operations in elmira with no rework nor nonconformities noted.This lot met all dimensional, visual, and packaging criteria at the time of release from elmira with no issues documented during the manufacture that would contribute to this complaint condition.A review of the raw material device history record revealed this lot met all specifications with no nonconformance noted.This raw material lot met all dimensional and visual criteria at the time of manufacture with no issues documented during the manufacture that would contribute to this complaint condition.Device history review: (b)(6) 2025.This lot met all dimensional, visual, and packaging criteria at the time of release with no issues documented during the manufacture that would contribute to this complaint condition.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|