• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC EDWARDS INSPIRIS RESILIA AORTIC VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC EDWARDS INSPIRIS RESILIA AORTIC VALVE; HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Model Number 11500A
Medical Device Problem Codes Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190); Intravalvular regurgitation (4068)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Dyspnea (1816); Insufficient Information (4580)
Date of Event 02/11/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was learned through implant patient registry that a 19mm 11500a aortic valve in aortic position was explanted and replaced with a 21mm 11060a konect valved conduit after an implant duration of 1 year, 2 months and 14 days.The reason for reintervention was not provided.Edwards lifesciences maintains an implant patient registry.This registry is a patient tracking mechanism for serialized edwards implantable devices (bioprosthetic heart valves and annuloplasty rings), rather than a true post-market surveillance registry.Through the registry, edwards is notified when these devices are implanted.In addition, patient and/or device status may be reported to the registry via the implantation data cards.The information is received from various sources (e.G.Surgeon, hospital, and patient family members) and is not received in the form of a conventional "customer complaint".The information reported may or may not be related to the edwards device.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: additional manufacturer narrative: the investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was learned through implant patient registry that a 19mm 11500a aortic valve in aortic position was explanted and replaced with a 21mm 11060a konect valved conduit after an implant duration of 1 year, 2 months and 14 days due to moderate to severe aortic regurgitation.The patient presented with dyspnea.Intraoperatively, a cavity was noted adjacent to where the right coronary ostium would be.The surgeon noted that this was likely a hematoma secondary to the prior root enlargement.An incredible amount of inflammation was noted throughout the aortic root.A 21mm 11060a valved aortic conduit was sutured into place.There was difficulty coming off cbp and patient was placed on ecmo.Hemostasis was obtained and patient was taken to the icu in critical condition.Patient discharged on pod#3.Per pathology, explanted aortic valve had no vegetations, tears, or calcifications along the valve cusps.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: additional manufacturer narrative: updated sections: b4, b5, b7, g3, g6, h2, h6 (type of investigation).
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: additional manufacturer narrative: updated sections: b4, g3, g6, h2, h6 (type of investigation, investigation findings, and investigation conclusions).The device history record (dhr) review was completed, and this device passed all manufacturing and sterilization inspections prior to release for distribution.There were no issues identified that would have impacted this event.Engineering evaluation summary: per (b)(4), regurgitation identified post-procedurally has many potential root causes, including structural valve deterioration (svd), non-structural valve dysfunction (nsvd), endocarditis and/or thrombosis.Regurgitation occurring during device implantation or post-procedurally is most commonly related to patient and/or procedural factors and is not typically an indication of a device malfunction related to a manufacturing non-conformance.There is no evidence to suggest a manufacturing defect caused or contributed to the reported event.The most likely root cause is patient-related factors, including coronary artery disease (cad).All pertinent information available to edwards lifesciences has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS INSPIRIS RESILIA AORTIC VALVE
Common Device Name
HEART-VALVE, NON-ALLOGRAFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
saurav singh
1 edwards way
mle fl2- office m2013
irvine, CA 92614
9492506615
MDR Report Key21674610
Report Number2015691-2025-02186
Device Sequence Number7600225
Product Code LWR
UDI-Device Identifier00690103194968
UDI-Public(01)00690103194968(17)261026(11)221027
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateGA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P150048
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2023
Device Explanted Year2025
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/02/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model Number11500A
Device Catalogue NumberN/A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/28/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer03/26/2025
05/02/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/23/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date04/21/2025
05/02/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured10/27/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Hospitalization; Life Threatening; Required Intervention;
Patient Age59 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-