| Catalog Number |
80201 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Break (1069); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
12/23/2024
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: as the lot number for the device was not provided, a review of the device history records could not be performed.The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H11: section a through f: the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a recanalization procedure in the left external iliac artery via contralateral approach, the tip of the device allegedly broken.It was further reported that the device was allegedly detached.Reportedly, the detached part could be snared.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was conducted and there was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: no physical sample / images / videos were received.A physical investigation was not possible.Due to no sample / images / videos received, the reported malfunction cannot be confirmed.A clear root cause could not be established.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a recanalization procedure in the left external iliac artery via contralateral approach, the tip of the device allegedly broken.It was further reported that the device was allegedly detached.Reportedly, the detached part could be snared.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10: manufacturing review: a manufacturing review was conducted and there was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the catheter was returned for evaluation, and thus physical investigation was performed for the catheter.During physical investigation the helix was found broken at 25 cm distance from the tip of the catheter.The tube of the catheter had a strong kink and a hole at the same position at 25 cm from the tip of the catheter.The broken part of the helix and the head part were missing.It was not possible to specify the root cause further using the information provided by the user.It can be confirmed that the helix was broken.A clear root cause could not be established.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a recanalization procedure in the left external iliac artery via contralateral approach, the tip of the device allegedly broken.It was further reported that the device was allegedly detached.Reportedly, the detached part could be snared.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|