| Catalog Number |
ENC452812 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Failure to Advance (2524)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
03/11/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturer's ref.No: (b)(4).Information regarding patient weight, height, medical history, race, and ethnicity was not reported.Section e1.Initial reporter phone: (b)(6).Section h3 - the device is available to be returned for evaluation and testing.However, it has not been received to date.If the device returns, a device investigation will be performed.Missing information from this report is identified as blank; this information was not provided in the reported event or available at the time of report submission.The company is seeking this information through the event investigation.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803 (and/or part 4, as applicable).This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by cerenovus, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, cerenovus, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
As reported by the field, during an endovascular embolization, a 4.5x28mm enterprise intracranial stent (enc452812, 9309015) became impeded in the proximal end of a prowler select plus 150/5cm microcatheter (606s255x, 31454975) and could not advance any more.The doctor removed the stent and microcatheter from the patient and switched to new devices to complete the procedure.The surgery was prolonged about 15 minutes.There was no patient injury reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturer ref#:(b)(4).Section b5: additional event information received on 25-mar-2025 indicated that they were able to torque the device.There was no evidence of physical material within the device.The microcatheter did not kink/bent.There was no excessive force used with the devices.The 15 minutes procedural delay was not clinically significant.A supplemental report will be submitted if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturer ref#: (b)(4) updated sections on this medwatch.Complaint conclusion: as reported by the field, during an endovascular embolization, a 4.5x28mm enterprise intracranial stent (enc452812, 9309015) became impeded in the proximal end of a prowler select plus 150/5cm microcatheter (606s255x, 31454975) and could not advance any more.The doctor removed the stent and microcatheter from the patient and switched to new devices to complete the procedure.The surgery was prolonged about 15 minutes.There was no patient injury reported.Additional event information received on 25-mar-2025 indicated that they were able to torque the device.There was no evidence of physical material within the device.The microcatheter did not kink/bent.There was no excessive force used with the devices.The 15 minutes procedural delay was not clinically significant.A non-sterile 4.5x28mm enterprise intracranial stent was received contained in the decontamination pouch.Upon receiving the device, a visual inspection was performed, and no apparent damage was observed.All the components were received in good condition.Further inspection was performed under a microscope, the delivery wire was inspected along its entire length, and no damages were found.The stent was found still inside the introducer.The stent was observed in good condition, with no structural damage (i.E., no broken struts, no kinks).The functional test was performed; the concomitant product, the prowler select plus was flushed using a lab sample syringe.After that, the enterprise was introduced into the prowler select plus, and it advanced, no resistance/friction was felt when the stent passed through.The stent came out from the distal tip of the microcatheter without difficulties.As the functional test was performed without issues, the impeded condition encountered during the procedure could not be confirmed.However, there may have been other circumstances or issues that occurred during the use of the device that could not be replicated during the analysis.Lake region medical did review the device history records relative to the manufacturing, inspecting and packaging of the lot 9309015.The history records indicate this product was final inspection tested at lake region medical and was determined to be acceptable.As part of the j&j medtech quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no capa activity is required at this time.It should be noted that multiple factors could cause product failure.The instructions for use (ifu) do contain the following recommendations: the introducer must be properly engaged with the infusion catheter hub to enable stent introduction into the infusion catheter.Do not apply undue force if resistance is encountered at any point during stent manipulation.Withdraw the unit and advance to a new one.If resistance is felt while recapturing the stent, do not continue to recapture the device.Withdraw the infusion catheter slightly to unsheathe the stent (without exceeding the recapture limit), and then attempt to recapture the stent again.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended to identify statistical signals for consideration of further correction action.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.A supplemental report will be submitted if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|