• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CETERIX ORTHOPAEDICS, INC NOVOSTITCH PRO MENISCAL RPR SYS 0; SUTURE, NONABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYETHYLENE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CETERIX ORTHOPAEDICS, INC NOVOSTITCH PRO MENISCAL RPR SYS 0; SUTURE, NONABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYETHYLENE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number CTX-A004
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Insufficient Information (4580); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 03/06/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: internal complaint reference (b)(4).H3, h6: this complaint was opened by smith+nephew to document a product problem associated with a smith+nephew device.The reported problem relates to known inherent device and/or procedural risks that are appropriately documented in our risk files.Smith+nephew will continue to monitor trends in accordance with our post-market surveillance process and take necessary action as required if anticipated severity and/or occurrence rates are exceeded.Smith+nephew has no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on our review of all currently available information, we are unable to identify a definitive root cause.However, as the use of our product cannot be excluded as a potential cause or contributory factor to the reported issue, we are conservatively submitting this report in accordance with applicable regulations.If additional investigative findings or information becomes available that alters the conclusions of this report, a follow-up report will be submitted as required.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during an arthroscopic procedure, the novostitch jaw was not opening and closing properly, and it was later discovered that part of the jaw had broken off inside the patient.The small piece was flushed out of the joint.Surgery was completed with a back-up device, resulting in a surgical delay of less than 30 minutes.No further complications were reported.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Internal complaint reference case-(b)(4).H3, h6: the reported device was received for evaluation.A visual inspection of the returned device found that it is not in its original packaging.The device was returned with the articulation bar for the top jaw fractured.There is biological debris on the device and the lower jaw is intact.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification upon release for distribution.A complaint history review identified similar reported events; however, no distinct trend has been observed for the reported event.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.The root cause of the reported event could not be determined since findings cannot lead to a clear cause of the reported event.Factors that could have contributed to the failure include procedural variance, or deviations from established protocols, increasing risks and leading to unintended consequences.Other factors include excessive force on the device, excessive torque on the device tip, attempted correction of a damaged device, or an inadvertent impact event.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that, during an arthroscopic procedure, the novostitch jaw was not opening and closing properly, then it was noticed that part of the jaw had broken off inside the patient.The piece was so small that had to be flushed out of the joint but it is unknown if it was completely removed.Surgery was completed with a back-up device instead.There was a surgical delay of less than 30 minutes, and no further complications were reported.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Internal complaint reference (b)(4).H11 b5 and h6: event description and codes updated.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that, during an arthroscopic procedure, the novostitch jaw was not opening and closing properly, then it was noticed that part of the jaw had broken off inside the patient.The piece was so small that had to be flushed out of the joint, post operative x-rays were clear.Surgery was completed with a back-up device instead.There was a surgical delay of less than 30 minutes, and no further complications were reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
NOVOSTITCH PRO MENISCAL RPR SYS 0
Common Device Name
SUTURE, NONABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC, POLYETHYLENE
Manufacturer (Section D)
CETERIX ORTHOPAEDICS, INC
6500 kaiser dr ste 120
fremont CA 94555
Manufacturer (Section G)
CETERIX ORTHOPAEDICS, INC
6500 kaiser dr ste 120
fremont CA 94555
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key21694823
Report Number3009131204-2025-00003
Device Sequence Number9281744
Product Code GAT
UDI-Device Identifier00853541006051
UDI-Public853541006051
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryUK
PMA/510(K) Number
K181772
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/27/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/02/2026
Device Catalogue NumberCTX-A004
Device Lot NumberM240132
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/06/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer04/28/2025
05/20/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/26/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/16/2025
05/27/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured07/02/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-