• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY IRELAND - 3015516266 BI MENTUM ALTRX LNR 51 28; HIP IMPLANT - ACETABULAR LINER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY IRELAND - 3015516266 BI MENTUM ALTRX LNR 51 28; HIP IMPLANT - ACETABULAR LINER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 122128051
Medical Device Problem Code Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Joint Dislocation (2374); Joint Laxity (4526); Unspecified Tissue Injury (4559)
Date of Event 02/27/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803 (and/or part 4, as applicable).This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a revision of a reclaim bimentum was done.The reason for revision was due to instability.The patient previously had a girdlestone procedure, and was like that for a number of years.The surgeon noted that during the primary surgery they were stable on the table with a 24x95 reclaim body, but their adductor muscles were gone, and surrounding tissues were dysfunctional.At some point after surgery patient moved into a position (which the surgeon advised not to) and they dislocated.The reclaim body, bimentum poly and 28+8.5 ceramic head were removed.Cup was retained.Then a longer body, new poly and 28+12 head were implanted.The surgeon said that the patient's soft tissues are very poor, and they have no adductor muscles.No previous revision had been done for dislocations.There was no surgical delay.Affected side: right side.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary: the reason for revision was due to instability.The patient previously had a girdlestone procedure and was like that for a number of years.The surgeon noted that during the primary surgery they were stable on the table with a 24x95 reclaim body, but their adductor muscles were gone, and surrounding tissues were dysfunctional.At some point after surgery, they we stable patient moved into a position (which the surgeon advised not to) and they dislocated.The reclaim body 197524095, bimentum poly 122128051 and 28+8.5 ceramic head were removed.Cup was retained.Then a longer body 1975-24-105, new poly 122128051 and 28+12 head 1365-14-000 were implanted.The surgeon noted after the case that he was 100% sure if this will work as the patient has poor soft tissues.The product was not returned to j&j medtech orthopaedics; however, photos were provided for review.(b)(4).The photographs attached were reviewed and revealed that the ceramic head is attached to the liner and shows signs of scratches, however none of the observed conditions are a device nonconformance, as they are consistent with the implantation or extraction process of the device.As the device was not returned, an as-received condition could not be assessed, and a dimensional inspection and document/specification review were not completed.The overall complaint was not confirmed as the photographs provided would have not contributed to the reported adverse event.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition.As part of j&j medtech orthopaedics quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device history lot: the product investigation found no evidence suspecting an error in the manufacturing or material that would be a contributing factor in the reported allegation(s).A manufacturing records evaluation (mre) was not performed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BI MENTUM ALTRX LNR 51 28
Common Device Name
HIP IMPLANT - ACETABULAR LINER
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY IRELAND - 3015516266
loughbeg ringaskiddy co.
cork
EI 
Manufacturer (Section G)
LEEDS MFG & MATERIAL WAREHOUSE
st anthonys road
leeds LS11 8DT
UK   LS11 8DT
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
700 orthopaedic dr.
warsaw, IN 46581
3035526892
MDR Report Key21696089
Report Number1818910-2025-04446
Device Sequence Number13026378
Product Code LZO
UDI-Device Identifier10603295525233
UDI-Public(01)10603295525233(17)270131(10)3693813
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryNZ
PMA/510(K) Number
K203532
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2025
Device Explanted Year2025
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number122128051
Device Lot Number3693813
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Follow-Up
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/27/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/27/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/26/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/28/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured02/26/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Concomitant Medical Products
and Therapy/Usage Dates
BI MENTUM PFRK CEM CUP 51.; DELTA CER HEAD 12/14 28MM +8.5.; PINN MULTIHOLE W/GRIPTION 66MM.; RECLAIM PRX BDY CONE 24X95.
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-