|
Additional information was provided in sections d.9, h.3, h.6 and h.11.Three opened 25 ga trocar assemblies were received for the report of product did not stick and cut well.Samples 1, 2 and 3 were inspected visually inspected for trocar blade and all were found to be conforming.Samples 1, 2 were visually inspected for cannula/ hub assembly and found to be conforming.Sample 3 was visually inspected and was found to be nonconforming with damaged septum/ angled slit.Dimensional ear width test was performed and was performed and all were found to be conforming.Functional penetration testing was then performed and all three samples were found to be conforming.A review of the device history record traceable to the reported lot number, indicates that the reported product was processed and released according to the reported product¿s acceptance criteria.The returned samples 1, 2 and 3 were conforming visually and dimensionally, therefore product did not stick well losse in incision) as described in the complaint was not confirmed and a root cause cannot be determined for the complaint as described by the customer.The returned samples 1, 2 and 3 were conforming visually and functionally, therefore product did not cut well as described in the complaint was not confirmed and a root cause cannot be determined for the complaint as described by the customer.Unrelated to the reported event, the trocar valve for sample 3 was found to be damaged.How and when the septum became damaged cannot be determined from the evaluation performed.A contributing factor to the damage in sample 3 is during insertion/ removal of the blade from the trocar cannula during surgery.Samples met specifications for the reported did not stick well and cut well issues and the exact root cause for damage to sample 3 is unknown therefore specific action for this complaint cannot be taken.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|