|
The customer reported false negative reactions in the b cell in reverse grouping using ih-cell a1,b on two different ih-1000 instruments.Manual re-testing of the samples yielded correct results, ranging from 3 to 4+.The false negative reaction in the b cell were related to one 20 year old patient with lupus, one 66 years old patient with multiple myeloma and one 72 year old patient with sarcoma.The customer indicated that the same situation was also experienced with the previous lost of ih-cell a1,b but examples were not provided.The trace files of both affected instruments were reviewed.No liq error occurred.Visually the total volume in both wells for the reverse test were the same and as expected.The pellet size was found to be normal and no interpretation problem due to small pellets were observed.A daily qc has been performed on the date of event and the expected results were obtained.Based on this information, reagent and instrument issues were not suspected.The information we received regarding the patients indicate that the discrepant results seem to be related to the nature of the samples and the patients' underlying conditions.Certain diseases or treatments like b cell lymphoma or chemotherapy can cause loss of backtype reactivity.Therefore, a weak or missing reaction in the reverse type for cancer patients or for patients who received a chemotherapy is scientifically explainable.The ifus of ih-card abd(dvi-) a1, b and ih-cell a1&b already contain an appropriate hint in the limitation section: decreased abo antibody reactivity may be seen with low titer isoagglutinin antibodies may be caused by disease states, the elderly or infants resulting in false negative reactions.The test was performed on the ih-1000 without incubation at room temperature.The customer was advised to retest with an incubation 10min at rt or 4 degree c increase incubation time, retest with a new sample, use fresh set of cells.Testing the samples with tube may enhance the reaction.Reagent red blood cell (rrbc) suspension is different in the tube method when compared to the gel technique, i.E., 5% vs 1%.Six of seven discrepancies were resolved when gel tests were incubated at room temperature with an increased serum or plasma volume.
|