• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EVOQUE TRICUSPID VALVE REPLACEMENT SYSTEM; PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED PROSTHESES AND TRICUSPID VALVES

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EVOQUE TRICUSPID VALVE REPLACEMENT SYSTEM; PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED PROSTHESES AND TRICUSPID VALVES Back to Search Results
Model Number 9850EV52US
Medical Device Problem Code Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Heart Block (4444)
Date of Event 02/27/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The manufacturer's investigation is ongoing and a follow-up report will be submitted when the investigation is complete.
 
Event or Problem Description
Edwards received notification of an evoque valve in tricuspid position where, the procedure was completed successfully, with trace central tricuspid regurgitation (tr) and no paravalvular leak (pvl).On post-operative day (pod) 2, the patient was noted to be in complete heart block and subsequently received a permanent pacemaker.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The following sections were updated/corrected/added: b4, g3, g6, h2, h6 and h11.H6 type of investigation: additional code 'labelling review'.The complaint for valve interacts with conduction system was confirmed with other empirical evidence via information reported by edwards clinical specialist.No manufacturing non-conformities was found during dhr review.A definite root cause is unable to be determined.Since no edwards defect was identified, corrective or preventative actions are not required.Per the instructions for use (ifu), conduction system disturbance and/or heart block which may require treatment (including permanent pacemaker) are potential adverse events.Heart block and other conduction disturbances are common in patients with underlying cardiovascular disease and can be exacerbated or aggravated with standard intra-operative medications or anesthesia.Such events are related to the patient's underlying condition.Other mechanisms for conduction abnormalities could be related to coronary obstruction due to air embolism, coronary spasm and/or local edema affecting the av node.Conduction disturbances have also been documented during transcatheter cardiac procedures as a result of direct interaction with cardiac anatomy, especially in patients with underlying conduction abnormalities.Other potential causes include trauma by a guidewire or delivery system.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EVOQUE TRICUSPID VALVE REPLACEMENT SYSTEM
Common Device Name
PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED PROSTHESES AND TRICUSPID VALVES
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
cassandra cook
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
5743778277
MDR Report Key21732450
Report Number2015691-2025-02442
Device Sequence Number15637108
Product Code NPW
UDI-Device Identifier00690103217469
UDI-Public(01)00690103217469(17)260708(11)240708
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateOH
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P230013
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2025
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/01/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/08/2026
Device Model Number9850EV52US
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/03/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer04/28/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/31/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/01/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured07/08/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexFemale
-
-