|
|
| Model Number |
0684-00-0469-01 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Backflow (1064); Infusion or Flow Problem (2964)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
03/13/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Due to character limit in e1 event site name (b)(6) hospital, (b)(6).The device has not been returned to the manufacturer so we are unable to complete an evaluation.If provided we will send a supplemental report with our additional findings.Complaint record id # (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the while inserting intra-aortic balloon tr3455 using the csave in the usual way, backflow was found in the catheter, so it was immediately removed.After confirming that it was not connected to the csave, a new iab catheter was reinserted and the procedure continued.No health hazards to the patient were found.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
N/a.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Updated fields: b4, d8, d9, g3, g6, h2, h3, h6 (type of investigation, medical device ¿ problem code, investigation findings, investigation conclusions), h11.Corrected fields: e1 (event site telephone).The product was returned with the membrane completely unfolded and blood on the exterior of the catheter and traces in the inner lumen.One kink was observed on the catheter tubing approximately 76.4cm from the iab tip.The one-way valve was also returned.An underwater leak test of the balloon, catheter, y-fitting, and extracorporeal tubing was performed, and no leaks were detected.One-way valve vacuum test was preformed, and it was able to hold vacuum.The iab was placed on the cardiosave pump and pumped for two hours which represents one complete autofill cycle.The iab pumped normally, and no alarm sounded from the pump.The reported events cannot be confirmed by the evaluation.Per ifu the one-way valve must be aspirated to 30cc while leaving the one-way valve in place attached to the extracorporeal tubing leur to ensure vacuum is maintained throughout insertion.A lot history record review was completed for the reported product.No nonconformances were found that are considered to be related to the event.The failure mode is addressed in the risk file and is operating within its risk profile.The ifu addresses the reported failure.There were no ncmrs identified which could cause or contribute to the reported failure.The investigation does not indicate that the device was inadvertently released as non-conforming or an adulterated product or was a counterfeit.The complaint history review did not identify an adverse trend (increase in number of complaints over past three (3) months).Based on the rational provided above, no escalation to the capa process is required.Reference complaint id: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Updated fields: b4, d4 serial, g3, g6, h2, h3, h6, h11.Corrected fields: d10 concomitant products.The product was returned with the membrane completely unfolded and blood on the exterior of the catheter and traces in the inner lumen.One kink was observed on the catheter tubing approximately 76.4cm from the iab tip.The one-way valve was also returned.An underwater leak test of the balloon, catheter, y-fitting, and extracorporeal tubing was performed, and no leaks were detected.One-way valve vacuum test was preformed, and it was able to hold vacuum.The iab was placed on the cardiosave pump and pumped for two hours which represents one complete autofill cycle.The iab pumped normally, and no alarm sounded from the pump.The reported event cannot be confirmed by the evaluation.Based on the event description, arterial blood under pressure may run the length of the folds in the balloon membrane and drip or be expelled under arterial pressure from the balloon/catheter junction.This 'channeling' is not a leak and will diminish as the iab catheter is inserted.A lot of history record review was completed for the reported product.No nonconformances were found that are considered to be related to the event.A lot of history record review was completed for the reported product.No nonconformances were found that are considered to be related to the event.The failure mode is addressed in the risk file and is operating within its risk profile.The ifu addresses the reported failure.There were no ncmrs identified which could cause or contribute to the reported failure.The investigation does not indicate that the device was inadvertently released as non-conforming or an adulterated product or was a counterfeit.The complaint history review did not identify an adverse trend (increase in number of complaints over past three (3) months).Based on the rational provided above, no escalation to the capa process is required.Reference complaint id: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
N/a.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|