• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. TWINFIX ULTRA 5.5MM PLLA/HA 2 UBWHT/BL; FASTENER, FIXATION, BIODEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. TWINFIX ULTRA 5.5MM PLLA/HA 2 UBWHT/BL; FASTENER, FIXATION, BIODEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 72202602
Medical Device Problem Code Fracture (1260)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 03/11/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that, during surgery, the twinfix ultra anchor fractured when tried to be implanted.Surgery was completed with a back-up device in the originally drilled bone hole, instead.There was a delay of less than 30 minutes, and no further complications were reported.Patient's status is good.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: internal complaint reference: (b)(4).H3, h6: this complaint was opened by smith+nephew to document a product problem associated with a smith+nephew device.The reported problem relates to known inherent device and/or procedural risks that are appropriately documented in our risk files.Smith+nephew will continue to monitor trends in accordance with our post-market surveillance process and take necessary action as required if anticipated severity and/or occurrence rates are exceeded.Smith+nephew has no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on our review of all currently available information, we are unable to identify a definitive root cause.However, as the use of our product cannot be excluded as a potential cause or contributory factor to the reported issue, we are conservatively submitting this report in accordance with applicable regulations.If additional investigative findings or information becomes available that alters the conclusions of this report, a follow-up report will be submitted as required.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: internal complaint reference:(b)(4).B5 and h6 updated.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that, during surgery, the twinfix ultra anchor fractured when tried to be implanted.Broken pieces were successfully removed from the patient with tweezers.Surgery was completed with a back-up device in the originally drilled bone hole, instead.There was a delay of less than 30 minutes, and no further complications were reported.Patient's status is good.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10 h3, h6: the reported device was received for evaluation.A visual evaluation showed the device was not returned with any original packaging.The anchor was not returned.The sutures are run through the cannula and tied at the cleat.The insertion device has no visible defects.A functional evaluation of the device could not be performed due to the anchor has already been deployed.An image evaluation revealed a broken anchor beneath a plastic wrap.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found no similar reported events.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A review of the raw material specifications found that the storage requirements for the material are specified, and the material must comply with provided percentage composition specifications as measured by ash test.A definitive root cause for the reported issue could not be determined.Factors that could have contributed to the failure include procedural variance, or deviations from established protocols, increasing risks and leading to unintended consequences.Other factor lines include hat could have contributed to the reported event include excessive force on the device, adverse impact events, or attempted reuse of a single use device.Based on this investigation, there is no evidence to suggest a design, material or manufacturing issue.Therefore, the need for corrective action is not indicated.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TWINFIX ULTRA 5.5MM PLLA/HA 2 UBWHT/BL
Common Device Name
FASTENER, FIXATION, BIODEGRADABLE, SOFT TISSUE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
130 forbes blvd.
mansfield MA 02048
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
130 forbes blvd.
mansfield MA 02048
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
1450 brooks rd.
memphis, TN 38116
5123913905
MDR Report Key21749220
Report Number1219602-2025-00732
Device Sequence Number17142191
Product Code MAI
UDI-Device Identifier03596010647573
UDI-Public3596010647573
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCH
PMA/510(K) Number
K151105
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/07/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number72202602
Device Lot Number2109629
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/11/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer04/07/2025
05/06/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date04/01/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date04/08/2025
05/07/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured02/15/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-