| Model Number |
CCA0T0 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Corneal Edema (1791); Intraocular Pressure Increased (1937); Blurred Vision (2137); Visual Impairment (2138); Visual Disturbances (2140)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Investigation including root cause analysis is in progress.A supplemental mdr will be filed as necessary in accordance with 21 cfr 803.56 when additional reportable information becomes available.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
A physician reported that, a patient status post lasik who underwent cataract surgery with the intraocular lens (iol) implant procedure who targeted for plano, ended up with a myopic surprise about -3.75 with some minor cylinder in the right eye.There are two medical device reports associated with this patient.This report is associated with the right.Additional information has been requested however no further information received.Additional information received and stated that, the patient being seen for follow-up postop surgery status post cataract extraction with iol and mlris (with monofocal distance) of the right lens.The surgery was performed on 1 day od, 1 week os.Since the surgery, the patient has noticed that colors appear more vivid and objects appear brighter in the affected eye.The patient has slept with an eye shield and taken eye medications as prescribed.The patient is taking the following medications in their right eye: corticosteroid, antibiotic and nsaids.Recommended to continue drops and shields.The patient status post cataract extraction 1 day od.The patient reports that her vision is a little blurry, but brighter.The patient reports following treatment as directed.On slit lamp examination right eye showed min edema at the incision site and min endotracking, trace corneal arcus.Anterior chamber were presented (cell 1+) iop is somewhat elevated in right eye (28), expected to decrease with healing.On (b)(6) 2024 the patient complained of major distortion, blurred vision worst than before surgery and swelling.Treatment was unchanged.It was reported that the patient was scared and frustrated with the results of her surgery.It was stated that the patient was healing nicely.The patient is bothered by her visual acuity for distance but reading distance is doing well.A refraction was completed today and patient does better with an refraction.Surgeon had a discussion with patient about findings and how her vision is not what we were expecting.The surgeon counseled patient to get an inexpensive pair of glasses for the time being while doing some research and figure out what is going on.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information provided in h.3., h.6.And h.11.The product was not returned for analysis.The hcp states " post operatively she ended up with a myopic surprise about -3.75 with some minor cyl in both eyes.He asked for help on knowing how his calculations were so off.The root cause for the reported complaint appears to be a coincidental event that was unrelated to the product as user facility reported that according to the surgeon, the iol did not cause the event.He states "post operatively she ended up with a myopic surprise about -3.75 with some minor cyl in both eyes.I wanted to inquire about this with someone and get some help on knowing how my calculations were so off".Based on this information, the product did not cause/contribute to the event.Based on the results from the product history record, the products met release criteria.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|