• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: JJGC S.A. GM TITAMAX IMPLANT,TI,5.0X8; ENDOSSEOUS DENTAL IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

JJGC S.A. GM TITAMAX IMPLANT,TI,5.0X8; ENDOSSEOUS DENTAL IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 109.921
Medical Device Problem Code Failure to Osseointegrate (1863)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Unspecified Infection (1930); Fibrosis (3167)
Date of Event 01/22/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The batch number could be verified.Our manufacturing q-system assures, that production and process controls are in place to ensure that batches conform to the applicable specifications before they are distributed.The non-integration of an endosseous dental implant during the healing phase is a known inherent risk of the treatment with dental implants.Most implant failures occur before occlusal loading (analainen et al.2009).Based on clinical studies about 1-3% of the implants fail within the first year after implantation (ganeles et al.2008).Implants may have to be removed in case one or more of the implant success criteria are not met.Implant success criteria according to buser et al.(1991) are: 1.Absence of persistent subjective complaints such as pain, foreign body sensation and /or dysesthesia.2.Absence of a recurrent peri-implant infection with suppuration.3.Absence of implant mobility.4.Absence of a continuous radiolucency around the implant.The manufacturer's trend analysis confirms that the reported early failure rate associated with its dental implants is below the expected failure rate for this treatment as published in the scientific literature.
 
Event or Problem Description
The clinician reports the implant was inserted on (b)(6) 2024 in fdi 46.Details of surgery: primary stability not achieved and implant surface not completely covered with bone.On (b)(6) 2025, non-osseointegration was verified.Patient presented with bone type iii.No product was returned to the manufacturer.At the event, the patient experienced: infection and mobility.No further patient complications were reported.
 
Event or Problem Description
The clinician reports the implant was inserted (b)(6) 2024 in fdi 46.Details of surgery: primary stability not achieved and implant surface not completely covered with bone.On (b)(6) 2025, non-osseointegration was verified.Patient presented with bone type iii.The device was forwarded to the manufacturer.At the event the patient experienced: infection and mobility.No further patient complications were reported.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The batch number could be verified.Our manufacturing q-system assures, that production and process controls are in place to ensure that batches confirm to the applicable specifications before they are distributed.The non-integration of an endosseous dental implant during the healing phase is a known inherent risk of the treatment with dental implants.Most implant failures occur before occlusal loading (analainen et al.2009).Based on clinical studies about 1-3% of the implants fail within the first year after implantation (ganeles et al.2008).Implants may have to be removed in case one or more of the implant success criteria are not met.Implant success criteria according to buser et al.(1991) are: 1.Absence of persistent subjective complaints such as pain, foreign body sensation and /or dysesthesia 2.Absence of a recurrent peri-implant infection with suppuration 3.Absence of implant mobility 4.Absence of a continuous radiolucency around the implant.The manufacturer's trend analysis confirms that the reported early failure rate associated with its dental implants is below the expected failure rate for this treatment as published in the scientific literature.Non-fatal serious injury or device malfunction stored due to covid 19 pandemic in accordance with fda guidance "postmarketing adverse event reporting for medical products and dietary supplements during a pandemic" published may 2020.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GM TITAMAX IMPLANT,TI,5.0X8
Common Device Name
ENDOSSEOUS DENTAL IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
JJGC S.A.
av. juscelino kubitschek de
oliveira, 3291 cic
curitiba PR 81270 -200
BR  81270-200
Manufacturer (Section G)
JJGC S.A.
av. juscelino kubitschek de
oliveira, 3291 cic
curitiba PR 81270 -200
BR   81270-200
Manufacturer Contact
jennifer jackson
60 minuteman road
andover, MA 01810
9787472509
MDR Report Key21791996
Report Number3008261720-2025-001126
Device Sequence Number8593277
Product Code DZE
UDI-Device Identifier07899878024101
UDI-Public07899878024101
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryRS
PMA/510(K) Number
K163194
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2024
Device Explanted Year2025
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Dentist
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/30/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number109.921
Device Lot NumberWYM79
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date03/30/2026
Event Location Other
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer Not provided
Supplement Date Received by ManufacturerNot provided
Initial Report FDA Received Date04/07/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date03/30/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/17/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age23 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-