| Model Number |
G43868 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Premature Activation (1484); Deformation Due to Compressive Stress (2889)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
03/14/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Pma/510(k) #: p050017/s002 and s003.Investigation is still pending, a follow up mdr will be submitted to include the investigation conclusions.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
When the physician started to insert the delivery system along the gw outside the patient's body, the stent became exposed (expanded) even though the safety lock was engaged.He completed the procedure with another manufacturer's deice (detail unknown).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Supplemental report is being submitted as a cancellation report following the receipt of additional information on 16 may 2025 that the description of the event was incorrect and the complaint no longer meets the description of a reportable incident.Fda mdr reporting not required: the event does not meet the criteria of an fda ¿serious injury¿ report or ¿malfunction¿ report as per fda guidelines ¿medical device reporting for manufacturers (2016)¿.No reporting malfunction precedence exists for this complaint event for this product family.No risk of failure mode indicates no potential for serious injury if the malfunction were to recur.No adverse effect to the patient was reported as occurring.The original report incorrectly indicated that the stent became exposed during insertion outside the patient¿s body, despite the safety lock being engaged.As a result, the physician used a device from a different manufacturer to complete the procedure (specific details of the alternate device are unavailable).The correct event involved treatment of the right iliac artery accessed via the left femoral artery.A ziv6-35-80-10-80 stent was inserted, but deployment at the target lesion was unsuccessful.After removing the safety tab, the physician attempted deployment again at the stenosis site, but it remained unsuccessful.The stent was then removed from the patient¿s body, and an attempt to deploy it outside the body resulted in partial deployment, which required significant force.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Pma/510(k) #: p050017/s002 and s003.Supplemental report is being submitted as a cancellation report following the receipt of additional information on 16 may 2025 that the description of the event was incorrect and the complaint no longer meets the description of a reportable incident.Fda mdr reporting not required: the event does not meet the criteria of an fda ¿serious injury¿ report or ¿malfunction¿ report as per fda guidelines ¿medical device reporting for manufacturers (2016)¿.No reporting malfunction precedence exists for this complaint event for this product family.No risk of failure mode indicates no potential for serious injury if the malfunction were to recur.No adverse effect to the patient was reported as occurring.The original report incorrectly indicated that the stent became exposed during insertion outside the patient¿s body, despite the safety lock being engaged.As a result, the physician used a device from a different manufacturer to complete the procedure (specific details of the alternate device are unavailable).The correct event involved treatment of the right iliac artery accessed via the left femoral artery.A ziv6-35-80-10-80 stent was inserted, but deployment at the target lesion was unsuccessful.After removing the safety tab, the physician attempted deployment again at the stenosis site, but it remained unsuccessful.The stent was then removed from the patient¿s body, and an attempt to deploy it outside the body resulted in partial deployment, which required significant force.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|