| Model Number |
1012580-19 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Obstruction/Occlusion (2422)
|
| Date of Event |
03/24/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturer's investigation is still pending at this time.Results and conclusions will be provided in the final report.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported the procedure was to treat a lesion in the mid left anterior descending (lad) artery.A perforation occurred therefore a 2.80x19mm graftmaster covered stent was implanted to seal the perforation.Post implant the stent occluded.No additional information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device was not returned for analysis.Production record and corrective and preventative actions (capa) reviews were performed and revealed no indication of a product quality issue.Additionally, a query of the complaint handling database for the reported lot revealed there is no indication of a lot of specific issue.The reported patient effect of occlusion is listed in the graftmaster rx coronary stent graft system, instructions for use (ifu), as a known patient effect that may be associated with use of a coronary stent in native coronary arteries.A conclusive cause for the reported patient effect, and the relationship to the product, if any, cannot be determined; however, the subsequent treatment appears to be related to the operational context of the procedure.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.B2: outcomes attributed to ae updated.H6: health effect - impact code 4614 removed, code 4641 added.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Subsequent to the initially filed medwatch report, additional information was provided.The graftmaster covered stent was implanted without issue; however, ivus was performed and the stent was occluded.Balloon inflations were used as treatment.There were no adverse patient sequela and no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|