|
Zimvie received one (1) tsx6b8, (tsx implant, 6.0mmd, 8mml) for evaluation.Visual evaluation / functional test was performed, no apparent malfunction was identified with the implant that would contribute to the reported event.Implant matched prints where measured.Dhr review was completed for the subject lot number 2120016595.No deviations or non-conformances, which could have caused or contributed to the reported event, were noted as part of the dhr.Complaint history review was performed for the reported lot number 2120016595, for similar events and no other complaint was identified.Review completed utilizing keywords: dental: medical: perforated sinus.The customer did not submit images for the reported event.Based on the investigation and risk management file review as per rm-00053-haz, the most likely root cause determined from the investigation was clinician inadvertently selects a length of implant that is too long for the depth of osteotomy prepared.Therefore, based on the available information, a device malfunction did not occur.The implant had no apparent malfunction was identified with the implant that would contribute to the reported event.The reported event was non-verifiable with all the available information.No further investigation or immediate capa / hhe/d escalation is required, as the complaint investigation did not confirm the products were nonconforming at the time of distribution, and no new failure mode, harm, or hazardous situation was identified through the investigation performed.At this time, the complaint investigation has been completed and the record will be closed.If additional information is received, the record will be re-opened for further evaluation.The following sections have been updated: b4: date of this report.G3: date received by manufacturer.G6: checked "follow-up".H2: checked follow-up type.H3: changed "no" to "yes".H6: entered evaluation codes.H10: added manufacturer narrative.
|