• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC MICROPUNCTURE TRANSITIONLESS ACCESS SET; DYB INTRODUCER, CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC MICROPUNCTURE TRANSITIONLESS ACCESS SET; DYB INTRODUCER, CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number G43872
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 03/04/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown or unavailable.A4: weight 84.7kg.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event or Problem Description
As reported, during an unspecified procedure, during which a micropuncture transitionless access set was used, the wire ¿separated at the hub¿ and per the reporter, is believed to result in the sheath ¿being detached in the leg¿.Fluoroscopy was unable to identify a separated fragment.The patient was taken to the operating room for surgical exploration; however, no foreign bodies were identified.There was no evidence of a foreign body within the patient.A ct without contrast of the right leg and an ultrasound of the arteries in the lower extremities were also performed on the day of the procedure.Additional information has been requested to clarify details of the event.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Summary of event: as reported, during an unspecified procedure, during which a micropuncture transitionless access set was used, the wire ¿separated at the hub¿ and per the reporter, is believed to result in the sheath ¿being detached in the leg¿.Fluoroscopy was unable to identify a separated fragment.The patient was taken to the operating room for surgical exploration; however, no foreign bodies were identified.There was no evidence of a foreign body within the patient.A ct without contrast of the right leg and an ultrasound of the arteries in the lower extremities were also performed on the day of the procedure.Investigation evaluation: reviews of the complaint history, device history record (dhr), instructions for use (ifu), and quality control procedures were conducted during the investigation.The complaint device was not returned to cook for investigation.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.A review of the device history record found no relevant non-conformances on the lot.A review of complaint history found no additional complaints for this lot number.The product ifu cautions ¿when inserting, manipulating or withdrawing a device through an introducer, always maintain introducer position¿ and ¿do not attempt to insert or withdraw the wire guide and/or introducer if resistance is felt¿.Wire or catheter embolism is listed as a potential adverse event.A review of the device master record (dmr) concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.The information provided upon review of the dmr, dhr, and ifu suggests that there is evidence the device was manufactured to specification.There is no evidence of non-conforming devices in-house or in the field.Based on the information provided and the results of the investigation, cook has concluded that a component failure, unrelated to manufacturing or design deficiencies, contributed to this event.The risk analysis for this failure mode was reviewed and no additional escalation was required.The appropriate personnel have been notified, and cook will continue to monitor for similar events.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MICROPUNCTURE TRANSITIONLESS ACCESS SET
Common Device Name
DYB INTRODUCER, CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer (Section G)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
jason crouch
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key21857393
Report Number1820334-2025-00402
Device Sequence Number18114997
Product Code DYB
UDI-Device Identifier00827002438729
UDI-Public(01)00827002438729(17)271220(10)16394408
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateTX
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K240589
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Risk Manager
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 10/16/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberG43872
Device Catalogue NumberMPIS-505-SST
Device Lot Number16394408
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/21/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer10/13/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date04/17/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date10/16/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured12/20/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age63 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight85 KG
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceWhite
-
-