• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ENDOLOGIX AFX2; BIFURCATED STENT GRAFT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ENDOLOGIX AFX2; BIFURCATED STENT GRAFT Back to Search Results
Model Number BEA25-90/I16-30
Medical Device Problem Code Off-Label Use (1494)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Aneurysm (1708); Clinical Endoleak (4843)
Date of Event 02/04/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device involved in this event will not be returned for evaluation as it remains implanted in the patient.Patient medical records and imaging studies will be requested for further evaluation by the clinical specialist.If additional information pertinent to the incident is obtained, a follow-up report will be submitted.Device iteration is afx2.
 
Event or Problem Description
The patient was treated for an abdominal aortic aneurysm (aaa).Angioplasty with bare metal stents (non-endologix) was performed in both iliac arteries due to significant calcification in the left common iliac artery (lcia) and luminal narrowing in the right common iliac artery (rcia).The physician then implanted an afx2 bifurcated stent graft and an afx vela suprarenal proximal extension.This initial procedure is outside the indications of use (off-label) due to the use of adjunctive devices not compatible with afx system per the ifu.Final angiography confirmed the absence of an endoleak and the procedure was completed.Approximately two (2) years post initial procedure, during a routine follow-up, aneurysm enlargement was observed.A month later a contrast-enhanced computed tomography (cect) scan was performed to investigate the aneurysm enlargement.The imaging raised suspicion for a type iii or type ii endoleak.Angiography was also performed but failed to identify the specific type of the endoleak.The final patient status is unknown.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The reported adverse event/incident was investigated in alignment with endologix operating procedures and work instructions.An evaluation of the manufacturing record was completed.A review of the part number/lot number combination needed for device identification shows the device to have been properly manufactured and released in accordance with the device master record.An evaluation of the device could not be completed.The device was not returned to endologix for evaluation because it remains implanted.A clinical evaluation of the adverse event/incident was completed.An examination of medical records and/or medical imaging received by endologix shows that the aneurysm enlargement complaint is unconfirmed.The endoleak of indeterminate origin complaint, determined to be a type iiia endoleak (poor apposition) of the main body, proximal cuff and type ii endoleak of the lumbar arteries is confirmed.This is moderately consistent with the reported adverse event/incident.The superior stent margin of the main body was sitting in area of angulation likely causing poor apposition of the main body to the proximal cuff.This likely contributed to the type iiia endoleak.The type ii endoleak of the lumbar arteries is anatomy related.There was concomitant product usage (bare metal stents in both iliac arteries) of non endologix stents making this off label.It is unlikely this contributed to the reported event.The clinical assessment determined that there was evidence to reasonably suggest additional endovascular procedure (diagnostic angiogram) occurred that was not included in the event as reported.The additional endovascular procedure complaint was discovered during review of the short video's post implant.The type iiia endoleak was determined to be anatomy related.The type ii endoleak complaint is anatomy related.Procedure related harms could not be determined.The final patient status was not reported.No additional investigation of this reported adverse event/incident is planned.However, should additional information relevant to the investigation outcome become available, a follow-up report will be submitted.Endologix will continue to monitor this and similar adverse events/incidents.Corrections: g3: date received by manufacturer has been updated.H6: result code: remove code 3233.H6: conclusion code: remove code 11.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AFX2
Common Device Name
BIFURCATED STENT GRAFT
Manufacturer (Section D)
ENDOLOGIX
2 musick
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
ENDOLOGIX
2 musick
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
gary kirchgater
2 musick
irvine, CA 92618
8009832284
MDR Report Key21858913
Report Number3011063223-2025-00044
Device Sequence Number17317437
Product Code MIH
UDI-Device Identifier00818009014863
UDI-Public(01)00818009014863(17)250902
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryJA
PMA/510(K) Number
P040002
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2023
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Remedial Action Recall
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/08/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/02/2025
Device Model NumberBEA25-90/I16-30
Device Lot Number2608318007
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/28/2025
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/07/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date04/17/2025
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/16/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured09/30/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
If action reported to FDA under 21 USC 360i(g), list
FDA-assigned Recall Number or include a statement
Z-0007-2019
Patient Sequence Number1
Concomitant Medical Products
and Therapy/Usage Dates
AFX VELA SUPRARENAL, LOT # 2575834005.; BARE METAL STENT(NON-ENDOLOGIX).; BARE METAL STENT(NON-ENDOLOGIX).
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other;
Patient SexMale
-
-